Transport of treosulfan and temozolomide across an in-vitro blood-brain barrier model

Ute Linz1, Michelle Hupert, Beatrix Santiago-Schübel

  • 1aResearch Center Jülich (FZJ), Institute of Complex Systems bResearch Center Jülich (FZJ), Central Institute for Engineering, Electronics and Analytics (ZEA-3), Jülich cDepartment of Bioprocess Technologies & Nanotechnology, Fraunhofer Institute for Biomedical Engineering, Sankt Ingbert, Germany.

Anti-Cancer Drugs
|April 29, 2015
PubMed

Insights

Treosulfan (TREO) shows limited brain penetration, explaining its ineffectiveness against malignant gliomas. This study used an in-vitro blood-brain barrier model to assess TREO transport, revealing poor influx compared to temozolomide (TMZ).

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Pharmacology
  • Oncology

Background:

  • Treosulfan (TREO) demonstrates in vitro efficacy against malignant gliomas.
  • Clinical trials for glioblastoma have yielded disappointing results, potentially due to insufficient drug delivery to the brain.
  • Limited data exists on treosulfan's brain penetration in patients.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the transport of treosulfan (TREO) across an in-vitro blood-brain barrier (BBB) model.
  • To compare TREO's brain penetration with temozolomide (TMZ), a standard glioma treatment.
  • To elucidate potential reasons for TREO's clinical ineffectiveness in treating brain tumors.

Main Methods:

  • An in-vitro blood-brain barrier model using primary porcine brain capillary endothelial cells was established.
  • High-performance liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-ESI-MS/MS) was developed for detecting TREO and TMZ.
  • Drug transport (influx and efflux) was measured, and permeability was calculated based on physicochemical properties.

Main Results:

  • Treosulfan exhibited low apical-to-basolateral (A-to-B) permeability (1.6%) across the in-vitro BBB model.
  • Efflux (basolateral-to-apical, B-to-A) permeability for TREO was higher (3.0%) than influx.
  • In contrast, temozolomide showed higher A-to-B (13.1%) than B-to-A (7.2%) permeability, validating the model.

Conclusions:

  • The in-vitro BBB model effectively simulated human BBB transport for TMZ and provided meaningful data for TREO.
  • Treosulfan's significantly lower influx compared to efflux suggests poor brain penetration.
  • This limited brain uptake likely explains the disappointing clinical outcomes of treosulfan for cerebral tumors.