Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Cephalometric changes in Angle Class II treatment.

H Fischer-Brandies

    International Journal of Orthodontics
    |January 1, 1989
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Angle class II malocclusion correction using the Bimler "GebiBformer" appliance is effective. The study found that successful treatment involves both skeletal and significant dentoalveolar changes, not just jaw displacement.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Tongue reduction in Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome: outcome and treatment algorithm.

    International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery·2018
    Same author

    Precision of cephalometric analysis via fully and semiautomatic evaluation of digital lateral cephalographs.

    Dento maxillo facial radiology·2009
    Same author

    [A whole new development from the Bending Art System].

    L' Orthodontie francaise·2004
    Same author

    Torque transmission between square wire and bracket as a function of measurement, form and hardness parameters.

    Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie·2000
    Same author

    Validity of the computer-assisted cephalometric growth prognosis VTO (Visual Treatment Objective) according to Ricketts.

    Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie·1999
    Same author

    The force module for the bending art system. Preliminary results.

    Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie·1998
    Same journal

    Retention of orthodontic brackets bonded with biomer cement.

    International journal of orthodontics·1991
    Same journal

    Lower crowding.

    International journal of orthodontics·1991
    Same journal

    Is it possible to modulate the growth of the human mandible with a functional appliance?

    International journal of orthodontics·1991
    Same journal

    How old is old?

    International journal of orthodontics·1991
    Same journal

    Early indicators.

    International journal of orthodontics·1991
    Same journal

    Which one?

    International journal of orthodontics·1991
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Orthodontics
    • Craniofacial Growth
    • Dental Biomaterials

    Background:

    • Functional orthopedic appliances are widely used for Angle class II correction.
    • Controversy exists regarding the primary mechanism: dentoalveolar changes, growth alteration, or jaw displacement.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To clarify the mode of action in Angle class II treatment using Bimler's "GebiBformer" appliance.
    • To differentiate between skeletal and dentoalveolar contributions to correction.

    Main Methods:

    • Cephalometric radiographs of 146 Angle class II patients before and after treatment were analyzed.
    • A control group of 100 class I patients undergoing functional jaw orthopedics was used for comparison.
    • Patients were categorized by craniofacial growth type and analyzed using t-tests.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • Class II patients showed posterior development of point A relative to nasion, unlike class I patients.
    • Maxillary length development was similar between groups; sagittal jaw discrepancy significantly reduced in class II patients.
    • Mandibular shape and length showed similar development in both groups, with only slight anterior advancement of point B in the class II group.

    Conclusions:

    • Angle class II correction with the "GebiBformer" involves changes in the craniofacial pattern.
    • Correction is not solely due to skeletal changes but is significantly influenced by dentoalveolar alterations.