Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 13, 2026

Probiotic Studies in Neonatal Mice Using Gavage
Published on: January 27, 2019
Gut colonization by aerobic microorganisms is associated with route and type of nutrition in premature neonates
Ülle Parm1, Tuuli Metsvaht2, Mari-Liis Ilmoja3
1Department of Microbiology, University of Tartu, Estonia; Tartu Health Care College, Estonia.
Insights
Early enteral nutrition, including breast milk or formula, promotes gut colonization in preterm infants. Despite increased opportunistic microbes, enteral feeding is linked to lower risks of late-onset sepsis and death compared to parenteral nutrition.
Area of Science:
- Neonatal nutrition and microbiome research
- Gastroenterology and infectious disease in neonates
Background:
- Beneficial effects of early enteral feeding are hypothesized to stem from increased gut microbial diversity.
- Understanding the relationship between feeding type, gut colonization, and neonatal morbidities like sepsis and NEC is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the association between feeding regimens (enteral vs. parenteral) and mucosal colonization in preterm neonates.
- To determine the impact of feeding type on the development of late-onset sepsis (LOS) and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC).
Main Methods:
- Prospective study involving 159 preterm neonates (≤72 hours old) with sepsis risk factors.
- Rectal swabs collected for microbial analysis; feeding regimens (TPN, BMCR, formula) recorded for 7 days.
- Multiple logistic regression used to analyze relationships between feeding, colonization, LOS, and NEC.
Main Results:
- Both breast milk-containing regimens (BMCR) and formula were associated with significantly higher colonization of Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria compared to total parenteral nutrition (TPN).
- TPN was linked to increased odds of late-onset sepsis (LOS) and mortality compared to formula feeding.
- BMCR showed higher colonization of Staphylococcus haemolyticus compared to formula and TPN.
Conclusions:
- Early enteral feeding, whether breast milk or formula, increases colonization by opportunistic microorganisms but is associated with a reduced risk of LOS.
- Enteral nutrition should be prioritized over TPN in preterm neonates when feasible due to its protective effect against LOS and improved survival outcomes.
- Further research into specific microbial profiles and their impact on neonatal health outcomes is warranted.
Abstract:
We hypothesized that the beneficial effects of early enteral compared with parenteral feeding are related to the increased variety of aerobic microorganisms that colonize the gut. Our aim was to describe the relationship, first, between the type of feeding and mucosal colonization and, second, between the type of feeding and the development of late-onset sepsis (LOS) and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in preterm neonates. In total, 159 neonates aged 72 hours or less with risk factors for early-onset sepsis were recruited to a prospective 2-center study. Rectal swabs were collected on admission and twice per week thereafter. The feeding regimen was recorded for the first 7 days and categorized into total parenteral nutrition (TPN) and 2 regimens of enteral nutrition, that is, breast milk containing regimen (BMCR), for which breast milk constituted at least 11% of the enteral diet, or formula. Herein, 70 neonates received formula, 48 received BMCR, and 41 received TPN; 69 cases of LOS and 15 cases of NEC were observed in 50 neonates. A multiple logistic regression analysis indicated that formula and BMCR were associated with 4- to 5-fold increases in colonization by Gram-negative bacteria (odds ratio [OR], 4.52; 1.87-10.95, and OR, 4.95; 1.90-12.87, respectively) and 5 to 9 times higher odds of colonization by Gram-positive microorganisms (OR, 5.75; 1.89-16.72, and OR, 8.61; 2.52-29.36, respectively) compared with TPN. The only difference between BMCR and the other feeding groups was the higher colonization with Staphylococcus haemolyticus in the latter (formula-OR, 6.24; 1.73-22.50; TPN-OR, 2.75; 1.08-6.97). Compared with BMCR, TPN was associated with an increased odds of LOS (OR, 3.04; 1.02-9.07) and an increased odds of death (19.75; 3.64-107.12) compared with formula. Although early enteral feeding is associated with a higher odds of colonization with opportunistic microorganisms, it should be preferred over TPN whenever feasible, due to the favorable effect on the prevention of LOS.
More Related Videos
09:36Effect of Hyaluronic Acid 35 kDa on an In Vitro Model of Preterm Small Intestinal Injury and Healing Using Enteroid-Derived Monolayers
Published on: July 28, 2022
07:09Oral Gavage in Neonatal Mouse Pups and Functional Assessment of Gut Barrier Integrity Using Ussing Chambers
Published on: January 9, 2026
Related Concept Videos
Development of Human Microbiota
Development of the Oral Microbiota
Anatomy of the Intestines
Small Intestines
The small intestine is an ~7 meter-long tube with an inner diameter of just 2.5 cm. Since most nutrients are absorbed here, the inner lining of the...
Microbiota of the Stomach and Small Intestine
Introduction to the Human Microbiota
Microbiota of the Large Intestine