Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 13, 2026

Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale
Published on: August 25, 2014
Does Social Health Insurance Close the Gap: The Case of Socioeconomic Status and Preterm Low-Birth-Weight Survival
Vivian Chia-Rong Hsieh1, Shwn-Huey Shieh2, Chiu-Ying Chen3
1China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan National Health Research Institutes, Zhunan, Taiwan.
Insights
Higher parental income and adequate antenatal care significantly reduce mortality in preterm or low-birth-weight (PLBW) babies. Promoting primary care access is crucial for preventing premature PLBW deaths.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Neonatal Medicine
- Health Economics
Background:
- Preterm or low-birth-weight (PLBW) babies face increased mortality risks.
- Understanding the impact of socioeconomic factors and healthcare access on PLBW infant survival is critical within universal healthcare systems.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the effects of parental socioeconomic status, primary care, and healthcare expenditure on PLBW infant mortality.
- To analyze neonatal, postneonatal, and under-5 mortality rates in PLBW infants under Taiwan's universal healthcare system.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort study utilizing a population-based medical claims database.
- Analysis of 4668 singleton PLBW babies born in Taiwan in 2001, with up to 5 years of follow-up.
- Multivariate survival models to assess the impact of income, antenatal care, and healthcare expenditure on mortality outcomes.
Main Results:
- Higher parental income showed a significant positive effect on survival during the neonatal period, diminishing in later stages.
- Adequate antenatal care demonstrated a consistent inverse relationship with mortality: neonatal HR=0.494 (95% CI=0.312-0.783), postneonatal HR=0.282 (95% CI=0.102-0.774), and under-5 HR=0.575 (95% CI=0.386-0.857).
- Healthcare expenditure did not show a significant independent effect on mortality in this cohort.
Conclusions:
- Parental income and access to quality antenatal care are significant determinants of survival for PLBW infants.
- Active promotion of primary care services, especially for lower-income families, is recommended to reduce premature PLBW mortality.
- Universal healthcare systems can mitigate some risks, but targeted interventions remain essential for vulnerable infant populations.
Abstract:
Using a retrospective cohort study design, we report empirical evidence on the effect of parental socioeconomic status, primary care, and health care expenditure associated with preterm or low-birth-weight (PLBW) babies on their mortality (neonatal, postneonatal, and under-5 mortality) under a universal health care system. A total of 4668 singleton PLBW babies born in Taiwan between January 1 and December 31, 2001, are extracted from a population-based medical claims database for a follow-up of up to 5 years. Multivariate survival models suggest the positive effect of higher parental income is significant in neonatal period but diminishes in later stages. Consistent inverse relationship is observed between adequate antenatal care and the three outcomes: neonatal hazard ratio (HR) = 0.494, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.312 to 0.783; postneonatal HR = 0.282, 95% CI = 0.102 to 0.774; and under-5 HR = 0.575, 95% CI = 0.386 to 0.857. Primary care services uptake should be actively promoted, particularly in lower income groups, to prevent premature PLBW mortality.
More Related Videos
07:36Modeling Encephalopathy of Prematurity Using Prenatal Hypoxia-ischemia with Intra-amniotic Lipopolysaccharide in Rats
Published on: November 20, 2015
14:43A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Socioemotional Development during Infancy
Primary Temperament Types
Environmental Influences on Intelligence
Relationship with Parents: Attachment
Benefits of Self-Esteem
Development of the Oral Microbiota
Applications of Life Tables