Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Errors in Global Positioning System01:26

Errors in Global Positioning System

437
Global Positioning System (GPS) technology has revolutionized navigation and positioning, but its accuracy is often compromised by various errors. These errors, stemming from environmental, satellite, and receiver-related factors, require careful mitigation to ensure reliable performance across applications.Atmospheric ErrorsGPS signals travel through the Earth’s ionosphere and troposphere, introducing delays which affect accuracy. The ionosphere is strongly influenced by charged particles,...
437
Field Application of Global Positioning System01:28

Field Application of Global Positioning System

384
The Global Positioning System (GPS) has become an indispensable tool in fieldwork, offering unparalleled precision and efficiency for surveying, navigation, and infrastructure development. By harnessing signals from a constellation of satellites, GPS receivers determine the location of objects with remarkable speed and accuracy, often completing calculations within a second.Advantages of Modern GPS TechnologyContemporary GPS receivers are designed to meet the practical demands of field...
384
Types of Global Positioning System Surveys01:30

Types of Global Positioning System Surveys

460
GPS surveying methods vary in application, accuracy, and data collection techniques, catering to diverse surveying and mapping needs. Static GPS, kinematic GPS, and real-time kinematic (RTK) surveying are widely used. Each technique offers distinct advantages.Static GPS involves placing one receiver at a known reference point and another at the target point. It collects exact positional data by observing multiple satellite ranges over an extended period, achieving centimeter-level accuracy for...
460
Design Example: Identifying the Locations of Monuments in the Field Using Global Positioning System Device01:30

Design Example: Identifying the Locations of Monuments in the Field Using Global Positioning System Device

489
Surveyors use Global Positioning System (GPS) technology to measure the precise location and elevation of points on Earth. In a recent survey, GPS receivers were used to determine the coordinates and elevations of two park monuments. The process involved careful mission planning, data collection, and correction to ensure accuracy. The survey began with mission planning to identify optimal satellite visibility and minimize Position Dilution of Precision (PDOP). A geodetic control point...
489
Introduction to Global Positioning System01:30

Introduction to Global Positioning System

774
The Global Positioning System (GPS) revolutionized positioning on Earth, providing precise location data through satellite ranging. The GPS system was developed in 1978 by the U.S. Department of Defense  for military use, and it became available for civilian applications in 1983, transforming fields including navigation, fleet management, and time synchronization for telecommunications systems.GPS consists of satellites in medium Earth orbit, about 20,200 kilometers above the surface,...
774
Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors01:17

Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors

619
A survey team is tasked with determining the elevation difference between points Point A and Point B, separated by uneven terrain. They use a leveling instrument and a leveling rod.Common MistakesMisreading the Rod: During a backsight reading at Point A, the instrumentman observes the rod partially obscured by tall grass. Instead of reading 1.135 m, they mistakenly record 1.735 m due to the misalignment of the crosshair with the wrong graduation. This error adds 0.600 m to all subsequent...
619

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

How to maximize the joint benefits of timber production and carbon sequestration for rural areas? A case study of larch plantations in northeast China.

Carbon balance and management·2024
Same author

The contributions of stand characteristics on carbon sequestration potential are triple that of climate variables for Larix spp. plantations in northeast China.

The Science of the total environment·2023
Same author

The effects of nearby trees on the positional accuracy of GNSS receivers in a forest environment.

PloS one·2023
Same author

Comparison between graph theory connectivity indices and landscape connectivity metrics for modeling river water quality in the southern Caspian sea basin.

Journal of environmental management·2022
Same author

Urban land use cover changes in three developed cities of the United States: San Diego, Denver, and Buffalo.

Heliyon·2022
Same author

The applicability of recreation-grade GNSS receiver (GPS watch, Suunto Ambit Peak 3) in a forested and an open area compared to a mapping-grade receiver (Trimble Juno T41).

PloS one·2020

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 13, 2026

Continuous-Wave Propagation Channel-Sounding Measurement System - Testing, Verification, and Measurements
09:36

Continuous-Wave Propagation Channel-Sounding Measurement System - Testing, Verification, and Measurements

Published on: June 25, 2021

3.6K

How a GNSS Receiver Is Held May Affect Static Horizontal Position Accuracy.

Steven A Weaver1, Zennure Ucar1, Pete Bettinger1

  • 1Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, 180 E. Green Street, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, United States of America, 30602.

Plos One
|April 30, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Receiver orientation during data collection may impact static horizontal position accuracy in forests. Season and forest type showed minimal influence on accuracy, suggesting careful receiver handling is key for optimal results.

More Related Videos

Tracking Infiltration Front Depth Using Time-lapse Multi-offset Gathers Collected with Array Antenna Ground Penetrating Radar
07:14

Tracking Infiltration Front Depth Using Time-lapse Multi-offset Gathers Collected with Array Antenna Ground Penetrating Radar

Published on: May 1, 2018

8.3K
Measurement of Spatial Stability in Precision Grip
09:36

Measurement of Spatial Stability in Precision Grip

Published on: June 4, 2020

3.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 13, 2026

Continuous-Wave Propagation Channel-Sounding Measurement System - Testing, Verification, and Measurements
09:36

Continuous-Wave Propagation Channel-Sounding Measurement System - Testing, Verification, and Measurements

Published on: June 25, 2021

3.6K
Tracking Infiltration Front Depth Using Time-lapse Multi-offset Gathers Collected with Array Antenna Ground Penetrating Radar
07:14

Tracking Infiltration Front Depth Using Time-lapse Multi-offset Gathers Collected with Array Antenna Ground Penetrating Radar

Published on: May 1, 2018

8.3K
Measurement of Spatial Stability in Precision Grip
09:36

Measurement of Spatial Stability in Precision Grip

Published on: June 4, 2020

3.6K

Area of Science:

  • Geomatics
  • Geospatial Science
  • Environmental Monitoring

Background:

  • Mapping-grade Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) receivers are crucial for accurate geospatial data collection.
  • Forest environments present unique challenges to GNSS signal reception and accuracy.
  • Understanding factors influencing static horizontal position accuracy is vital for reliable data acquisition.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the static horizontal position accuracy of a GNSS receiver under various forest conditions.
  • To determine the impact of receiver holding position (vertical, angled, horizontal) on accuracy.
  • To assess the influence of season, forest type, and environmental variables on GNSS accuracy.

Main Methods:

  • Tested a mapping-grade GNSS receiver in two forest types across two seasons.
  • Compared accuracy in a forest setting against open sky conditions during winter.
  • Analyzed static horizontal position accuracy based on receiver orientation and environmental factors.

Main Results:

  • Mean static horizontal position accuracy was generally within expected ranges (3-5m) without differential correction.
  • Vertical receiver orientation sometimes yielded higher accuracy in forests, possibly due to antenna orientation or signal multipath.
  • Season and atmospheric variables showed no significant effect; forest type had limited impact on accuracy.

Conclusions:

  • Weak to moderate evidence suggests receiver holding position can significantly affect static horizontal position accuracy in forests.
  • Understanding antenna positioning within the receiver may enhance data collection accuracy.
  • Further research into optimal receiver handling techniques in challenging environments is warranted.