Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 13, 2026

Assessment of Social Cognition in Non-human Primates Using a Network of Computerized Automated Learning Device ALDM Test Systems
Published on: May 5, 2015
Suffixation influences receivers' behaviour in non-human primates.
Camille Coye1, Karim Ouattara2, Klaus Zuberbühler3
1Laboratoire EthoS, Université de Rennes 1, U.M.R 6552-C.N.R.S, Station Biologique de Paimpont, 35380, Paimpont, France School of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife KY16 9AJ, UK Centre Suisse de Recherches Scientifiques, Taï Monkey Project, Adiopodoumé, Abidjan Ivory Coast camille.coye@univ-rennes1.fr.
Male Campbell's monkeys use call suffixes to convey specific dangers, like leopards versus unspecific threats. Diana monkeys responded more strongly to calls indicating specific dangers, suggesting evolved communication functions in primates.
Area of Science:
- Primate communication
- Bioacoustics
- Animal behavior
Background:
- Non-human primates have limited vocal control compared to humans.
- Some primates use call combinations to enhance communication.
- Campbell's monkeys (Cercopithecus campbelli) use 'Krak' for leopards and 'Krak-oo' for general danger.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if Diana monkeys (Cercopithecus diana diana) distinguish between suffixed and unsuffixed 'Krak' calls.
- To determine the functional significance of suffixation in primate vocalizations.
- To assess the role of call modifications in conveying specific threat information.
Main Methods:
- Playback experiment using naturally and artificially modified 'Krak' calls.
- Broadcasted calls to 42 wild groups of Diana monkeys.
- Analyzed vocal responses of male and female Diana monkeys.
Main Results:
- Diana monkeys showed significantly stronger vocal responses to unsuffixed ('leopard') calls than suffixed ('unspecific danger') calls.
- The presence or absence of the suffix was the primary determinant of response.
- Acoustic structure of the call stem had a secondary effect on responses.
Conclusions:
- Suffixation in primate vocalizations is an evolved communication strategy.
- This strategy is particularly important in contexts requiring adaptive responses to threats.
- Primate vocal communication can convey specific information despite limited vocal flexibility.
Related Concept Videos
Nonconscious Mimicry
Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior
First Impression
Framing Effects
Behaviorism
The core premise of behaviorism is its focus on observable behavior rather than internal thoughts or feelings. This approach argues that true scientific...
Facial Feedback Hypothesis

