Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Visual and auditory coding confusability in students with and without learning disabilities.

B W Hardy, C W McIntyre, A S Brown

    Journal of Learning Disabilities
    |December 1, 1989
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Dialyzer characteristics are associated with differential effects on intradialytic microvascular tissue perfusion.

    Annals of medicine and surgery (2012)·2026
    Same author

    Correction to: Elevated maternal C-reactive protein and autism in a national birth cohort.

    Molecular psychiatry·2025
    Same author

    Patient-centred outcomes.

    BJA education·2025
    Same author

    Author Correction: Intravital microscopic observation of the microvasculature during hemodialysis in healthy rats.

    Scientific reports·2022
    Same author

    Intravital microscopic observation of the microvasculature during hemodialysis in healthy rats.

    Scientific reports·2022
    Same author

    Hemodynamic response to non-pneumatic anti-shock compression garments in patients with renal dysfunction.

    BMC nephrology·2020
    Same journal

    Associations Between Self-Reported Literacy and Anxiety and Depressive Symptoms in Children, Adolescents, and Older Adults.

    Journal of learning disabilities·2026
    Same journal

    Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Learning Disabilities Identification in U.S. Elementary Schools.

    Journal of learning disabilities·2026
    Same journal

    Universal Screening of Early Numeracy Skills in Spanish-Speaking Kindergarteners.

    Journal of learning disabilities·2026
    Same journal

    AI Chatbots and Dyslexia: How AI Chatbots Empower Students With Dyslexia to Master Arithmetic Word Problems.

    Journal of learning disabilities·2026
    Same journal

    Instructional Decision-Making for Students With Intensive Early Writing Needs: Student Growth in Sentence-Level Curriculum-Based Measurement.

    Journal of learning disabilities·2026
    Same journal

    Effects of Calculation and Reading Fluency Interventions Focusing on Awareness and Adaptive Use of Strategies: Supporting Children With Comorbid Fluency Problems.

    Journal of learning disabilities·2026
    See all related articles

    Students with learning disabilities (SLDs) initially showed slower responses in a letter-matching task but similar confusion patterns. With practice, SLDs used visual and auditory coding less than student controls (SCs).

    Area of Science:

    • Cognitive Psychology
    • Developmental Psychology
    • Educational Psychology

    Background:

    • Students with learning disabilities (SLDs) often exhibit differences in cognitive processing.
    • Understanding visual and auditory coding is crucial for addressing learning challenges.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate the differences in visual and auditory coding processes between students with learning disabilities (SLDs) and student controls (SCs).
    • To examine how practice affects these coding processes in both groups.

    Main Methods:

    • A letter-matching task was administered to SLDs and SCs using four types of letter pairs (identical, visually confusable, auditorily confusable, neither).
    • Two delay intervals (0 and 2 seconds) were implemented between letter presentations.
    • Decision latencies and confusability patterns were analyzed.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • Initially, SLDs responded more slowly than SCs, with similar visual and auditory confusability patterns.
    • After practice, decision latencies became comparable between groups.
    • SCs demonstrated distinct visual and auditory confusability patterns based on delay intervals, which SLDs did not exhibit.

    Conclusions:

    • SLDs appear to utilize visual and auditory coding processes less extensively than SCs.
    • Practice influences cognitive task performance but does not fully equalize coding strategy differences.
    • Findings suggest targeted interventions may be beneficial for enhancing coding strategies in SLDs.