Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Acoustic interference in a recognition task.

J Lutz1, K L Wuensch

  • 1Department of Psychology, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858-4353.

The Journal of General Psychology
|October 1, 1989
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Structural and process parameters of interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy in Germany-an update].

Schmerz (Berlin, Germany)·2026
Same author

[The judgment of the Federal Social Court on the involvement of psychological psychotherapists in interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy : A critical comment].

Schmerz (Berlin, Germany)·2021
Same author

[Is interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy threatened? : Increasing controversy on the necessity for inpatient treatment].

Schmerz (Berlin, Germany)·2020
Same author

[Traveling with immunodeficiency-Problems and prevention].

Der Internist·2019
Same author

[Cross-sectoral interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy : Recommendations on structural and process parameters of the ad hoc commission "Interdisciplinary Multimodal Pain Therapy" of the German Pain Society (Deutsche Schmerzgesellschaft e.  V.)].

Schmerz (Berlin, Germany)·2019
Same author

Training emotion regulation through real-time fMRI neurofeedback of amygdala activity.

NeuroImage·2018

Phonetic word characteristics cause more memory interference than semantic ones in short-term recognition tasks. This effect diminishes over longer intervals, unlike in recall.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Human Memory Research
  • Experimental Psychology

Background:

  • Previous recall studies indicate phonetic characteristics of stimuli cause greater short-term interference than semantic characteristics.
  • The effect of stimulus characteristics on interference in recognition memory, especially over short intervals, remains less understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether phonetic characteristics also generate more interference than semantic characteristics in short-term recognition memory.
  • To compare the time course of interference effects in recognition memory versus previously studied recall tasks.

Main Methods:

  • Three experiments were conducted using word recognition tasks.
  • Participants studied lists of eight words and later identified them from subsequent lists containing distractors.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Short delays (0-100 seconds) with rehearsal-preventing tasks were employed between study and test phases.

    • Main Results:

    • Phonetic distractors consistently produced greater interference than semantic distractors across all tested delay intervals.
    • Semantic distractors also generated significantly more interference than random distractors.
    • These differences in distractor type effects were absent in long-term recognition scenarios.

    Conclusions:

    • Phonetic interference is a robust phenomenon in short-term recognition memory, mirroring findings in recall.
    • The rate of performance decline over time in recognition memory is slower compared to previous recall studies.
    • Distractor characteristics significantly impact short-term recognition accuracy, with phonetic properties being particularly disruptive.