Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 13, 2026

Comprehensive Workflow of Mass Spectrometry-based Shotgun Proteomics of Tissue Samples
Published on: November 13, 2021
Protein identification and quantification from riverbank grape, Vitis riparia: Comparing SDS-PAGE and FASP-GPF
Iniga S George1, Anne Y Fennell2, Paul A Haynes1
1Department of Chemistry and Biomolecular Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW, Australia.
Abstract:
Protein sample preparation optimisation is critical for establishing reproducible high throughput proteomic analysis. In this study, two different fractionation sample preparation techniques (in-gel digestion and in-solution digestion) for shotgun proteomics were used to quantitatively compare proteins identified in Vitis riparia leaf samples. The total number of proteins and peptides identified were compared between filter aided sample preparation (FASP) coupled with gas phase fractionation (GPF) and SDS-PAGE methods. There was a 24% increase in the total number of reproducibly identified proteins when FASP-GPF was used. FASP-GPF is more reproducible, less expensive and a better method than SDS-PAGE for shotgun proteomics of grapevine samples as it significantly increases protein identification across biological replicates. Total peptide and protein information from the two fractionation techniques is available in PRIDE with the identifier PXD001399 (http://proteomecentral.proteomexchange.org/dataset/PXD001399).
More Related Videos
08:09An Aquatic Microbial Metaproteomics Workflow: From Cells to Tryptic Peptides Suitable for Tandem Mass Spectrometry-based Analysis
Published on: September 15, 2015
09:35Resolving Affinity Purified Protein Complexes by Blue Native PAGE and Protein Correlation Profiling
Published on: April 1, 2017