Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 13, 2026
14:43
A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
13.7K
Summary
The National Cancer Institute (NCI) is investing $40 million to fund overlooked cancer research areas. This initiative supports investigations into critical knowledge gaps and unresolved questions in the field.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Cancer Research Funding
Background:
- The National Cancer Institute (NCI) has allocated $40 million over two years.
- This funding is designated for the Provocative Questions Initiative (PQI).
Discussion:
- The PQI focuses on neglected or understudied areas within cancer research.
- It aims to address significant gaps in current scientific knowledge.
- The initiative seeks to resolve long-standing, unresolved questions in oncology.
Key Insights:
- Significant financial investment directed towards under-explored cancer research domains.
- Strategic focus on foundational scientific questions rather than immediate clinical applications.
- Potential to uncover novel insights by challenging existing paradigms in cancer biology.
Outlook:
- Anticipated advancements in fundamental cancer science through targeted funding.
- Encourages innovative research proposals addressing complex, unanswered questions.
- Aims to stimulate new avenues of inquiry and discovery in the fight against cancer.
More Related Videos
06:45Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
Published on: April 18, 2017
6.7K
11:17Protocol for Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation with Symptom Provocation to Treat Obsessive-compulsive Disorder
Published on: November 25, 2025
911
Related Concept Videos
02:20Milgram's Obedience to Authority
7.8K
Obedience to authority is classically demonstrated in a more famous series of social psychology experiments performed by Stanley Milgram. He was a social psychology professor at Yale who was influenced by the trial of Adolf Eichmann, a Nazi war criminal. Eichmann’s defense for the atrocities he committed was that he was “just following orders.”
7.8K
02:16Surveys
17.3K
Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
17.3K
01:19Counterfactual Thinking
409
Counterfactual thinking is a cognitive process wherein individuals mentally reconstruct alternative versions of past events, often beginning with “what if” or “if only.” This reflective mechanism plays a significant role in shaping emotional experiences and guiding future behavior. Though typically triggered by unfavorable or unexpected outcomes, counterfactual thinking can also emerge in mundane, everyday decisions and experiences, revealing its deep entrenchment in...
409
01:08Obedience
35.8K
According to obedience research, we may harm others under the forceful pressures of an authority figure (Milgram, 1974). How about if the inappropriate orders were delivered with less force? The increasing interdependence between nurses and physicians compelled Hofling and his colleagues to explore nurses’ reactions to a potentially harmful medical request made by the perceived authority figure, the doctor (Hofling, Brotzman, Dalrymple, Graves, & Pierce, 1966). In this situation,...
35.8K
02:40The Scientific Method
67.4K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
67.4K
01:19Critical Thinking
1.4K
Critical thinking involves reflective and productive thinking and the evaluation of evidence. Critical thinkers seek to understand the deeper meaning of ideas, question assumptions, and make independent decisions about what to believe or do. Scientists, for instance, are often critical thinkers. Critical thinking also requires humility about what we know and don't know and the motivation to look beyond the obvious. It is essential for effective problem-solving.
Colleges and universities are...
Colleges and universities are...
1.4K