Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Association Areas of the Cortex01:21

Association Areas of the Cortex

10.7K
Association areas are regions of the cerebral cortex that do not have a specific sensory or motor function. Instead, they integrate and interpret information from various sources to enable higher cognitive processes such as memory, learning, and decision-making. Some key association areas include the following:
Prefrontal Association Area: This area is located in the frontal lobe and is involved in planning, decision-making, and moderating social behavior. It connects with primary motor areas,...
10.7K
Major Somatic Sensory Pathways01:28

Major Somatic Sensory Pathways

3.5K
Sensory impulses related to touch, pressure, vibration, and proprioception from various body parts, such as the limbs, trunk, neck, and posterior head, travel to the cerebral cortex through the posterior column-medial lemniscus pathway. The pathway’s name derives from the two white-matter tracts that convey the impulses: the spinal cord's posterior column and the brainstem's medial lemniscus. First-order sensory neurons extend their axons into the spinal cord, forming the...
3.5K
Depth Perception and Spatial Vision01:15

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

2.7K
Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.
2.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The gut feeling in motion sickness.

Communications biology·2025
Same author

Visually induced motion sickness correlates with on-road car sickness while performing a visual task.

Experimental brain research·2025
Same author

General lighting can overcome accidental viewing.

i-Perception·2024
Same author

Neck stabilization through sensory integration of vestibular and visual motion cues.

Frontiers in neurology·2023
Same author

Validating models of sensory conflict and perception for motion sickness prediction.

Biological cybernetics·2023
Same author

A meta-analysis of simulator sickness as a function of simulator fidelity.

Experimental brain research·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 13, 2026

MPI CyberMotion Simulator: Implementation of a Novel Motion Simulator to Investigate Multisensory Path Integration in Three Dimensions
09:46

MPI CyberMotion Simulator: Implementation of a Novel Motion Simulator to Investigate Multisensory Path Integration in Three Dimensions

Published on: May 10, 2012

13.3K

Forced fusion in multisensory heading estimation.

Ksander N de Winkel1, Mikhail Katliar1, Heinrich H Bülthoff2

  • 1Department of Human Perception, Cognition, and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Spemanstrasse 38, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.

Plos One
|May 5, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The Central Nervous System (CNS) often integrates visual and inertial heading cues, even with large discrepancies. This suggests a surprising insensitivity to conflicting multisensory information during motion perception.

More Related Videos

Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example
08:45

Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example

Published on: October 24, 2012

15.4K
Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

7.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 13, 2026

MPI CyberMotion Simulator: Implementation of a Novel Motion Simulator to Investigate Multisensory Path Integration in Three Dimensions
09:46

MPI CyberMotion Simulator: Implementation of a Novel Motion Simulator to Investigate Multisensory Path Integration in Three Dimensions

Published on: May 10, 2012

13.3K
Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example
08:45

Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example

Published on: October 24, 2012

15.4K
Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

7.6K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Sensory Integration
  • Human Perception

Background:

  • The Central Nervous System (CNS) integrates visual and inertial information for heading estimation.
  • Multisensory integration typically occurs when sensory cues are redundant.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how the CNS constructs heading estimates using visual and inertial stimuli with a wide range of discrepancies.
  • To determine the conditions under which multisensory information is integrated or disregarded.

Main Methods:

  • Participants experienced visual-only, inertial-only, and combined visual-inertial motion stimuli.
  • Discrepancies between visual and inertial heading stimuli ranged from 0-90 degrees.
  • Behavioral data were analyzed using computational models, including causal inference.

Main Results:

  • Unisensory visual heading was biased towards the fore-aft axis; inertial heading was biased away.
  • Five out of nine participants integrated visual and inertial heading information irrespective of discrepancy size.
  • One participant's data fit a causal inference model; three were inconclusive.

Conclusions:

  • The CNS generally integrates visual and inertial heading information, even with substantial discrepancies.
  • This integration occurs despite potential cue conflicts, challenging previous assumptions about redundancy requirements.
  • Potential explanations for disregarding discrepancies include insensitivity due to artificial environments or stimulus duration-dependent detection thresholds.