Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The pre-registration year 1983-1988.

J S Biggs1

  • 1Centre for Medical Education, University of Dundee.

Medical Education
|November 1, 1989
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The UK's mandatory pre-registration year for doctors has improved, but requires attention to working hours, career support, and supervisor training for better outcomes.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The potential for refining nitrogen fertiliser management through accounting for climate impacts: An exploratory study for the Tully region.

Marine pollution bulletin·2021
Same author

Information from other countries.

Medical education·1997
Same author

Training for visiting registrars: experience in East Anglia, UK.

Postgraduate medical journal·1996
Same author

Medical audit and medical education.

Medical education·1995
Same author

Outcome of flexible training in east Anglian region.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·1994
Same author

Postgraduate medical and dental education in the new NHS.

British journal of hospital medicine·1994

Area of Science:

  • Medical Education
  • Postgraduate Training
  • Clinical Practice

Background:

  • The pre-registration year is a mandatory general clinical training period in the UK.
  • This training year has faced recent scrutiny and criticism within the medical community.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the existing literature on the UK's pre-registration year.
  • To evaluate the program's effectiveness in light of recent recommendations.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of the pre-registration year.
  • Analysis framed by the 1983 Association for the Study of Medical Education (ASME) review.
  • Focus on the 1987 General Medical Council recommendations.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • The pre-registration program has undergone improvements.
  • Key areas identified for further development include house officers' duty hours.
  • Enhanced career counseling and improved training for supervisors are also noted.

    • Conclusions:

    • The pre-registration year in the UK has shown positive developments.
    • Further enhancements are necessary, particularly concerning resident well-being and professional development.
    • Addressing duty hours, career guidance, and supervisor training is crucial for program optimization.