Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

9.3K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
9.3K
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs01:20

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

386
Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to subjects...
386
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

395
Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
395
Censoring Survival Data01:09

Censoring Survival Data

668
Survival analysis is a statistical method used to analyze time-to-event data, often employed in fields such as medicine, engineering, and social sciences. One of the key challenges in survival analysis is dealing with incomplete data, a phenomenon known as "censoring." Censoring occurs when the event of interest (such as death, relapse, or system failure) has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period or is otherwise unobservable, and it might have many different...
668
Group Design02:01

Group Design

11.0K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
11.0K
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

719
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
719

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Primary Hodgkin's Lymphoma of bone in 7-year-old- an exceptional case report of youngest child in literature.

Cancer treatment and research communications·2021
Same author

Multinomial N-mixture models for removal sampling.

Biometrics·2019
Same author

Maximum likelihood estimation for N-mixture models.

Biometrics·2016
Same author

Commentary on 'Designs of dose-escalation trials with quantitative responses'.

Statistics in medicine·2009
Same author

Sequential designs for ordinal phase I clinical trials.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2009
Same author

Sequential designs for logistic phase I clinical trials.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2006
Same journal

Optimal Weighted Tests for Replication Studies and the 'Two-Trials Rule' With Multiple Hypotheses.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Identifiable Copula-Double-Cox Models: A Fully Parametric Framework for Dependent Right-Censored Survival Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Moving From Individualized Risk-Based Prevention to Benefit-Based Prevention: Estimating Individualized Life-Years Gained From Prevention Services as a Basis for Eligibility.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

A Mixture of Distributed Lag Non-Linear Models to Account for Spatially Heterogeneous Exposure-Lag-Response Associations.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Practical Considerations for Gaussian Process Modeling for Causal Inference in Quasi-Experimental Studies With Panel Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Covariate Adjustment for Wilcoxon Two Sample Statistic and Test.

Statistics in medicine·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 13, 2026

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1.4K

Start-up designs for response-adaptive randomization procedures with sequential estimation.

Linda M Haines1, Hassan Sadiq1

  • 1Department of Statistical Sciences, University of Cape Town, Private Bag X3, Rondebosch, 7701, South Africa.

Statistics in Medicine
|May 7, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

For clinical trials with sequential patient data, specific start-up designs are crucial for response-adaptive randomization. Permuted block designs with blocks of size 4 are recommended for binary responses, while complete randomization followed by treatment repeats is optimal for normal responses.

Keywords:
binary responsesnormal responsesresponse-adaptive randomization proceduressequential parameter estimationstart-up designs

More Related Videos

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.5K
Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment
06:48

Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: June 25, 2019

10.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 13, 2026

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1.4K
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.5K
Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment
06:48

Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: June 25, 2019

10.0K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trial Design
  • Statistical Methods

Background:

  • Response-adaptive randomization is suitable for sequential clinical trials comparing multiple treatments.
  • Sequential estimation of parameters in these trials necessitates effective start-up designs for initial estimates.
  • Existing start-up designs may require evaluation for efficiency and bias in parameter estimation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate and compare various start-up designs for two-treatment clinical trials with binary patient responses.
  • To assess designs based on the number of patients needed for meaningful parameter estimates, allocation to the better treatment, and parameter bias.
  • To identify optimal start-up designs for both binary and normal patient responses in adaptive clinical trials.

Main Methods:

  • Comparison of several start-up designs for two treatments and binary responses.
  • Analysis of permuted block designs with varying block sizes, focusing on blocks of size 4.
  • Evaluation of a design combining complete randomization with subsequent treatment repeats for normal responses.

Main Results:

  • Permuted block designs with blocks of size 4 are shown to be preferable across a wide range of parameter values for binary responses.
  • For normal responses, a design using initial complete randomization followed by repeats of one treatment minimizes the expected number of patients.
  • The study quantifies patient numbers, allocation advantages, and bias associated with different start-up designs.

Conclusions:

  • Permuted block designs with blocks of size 4 offer a robust and efficient start-up strategy for response-adaptive randomization in binary outcome trials.
  • For trials with normal responses, a hybrid design of initial complete randomization followed by adaptive treatment allocation is the most efficient.
  • The findings provide practical guidance for selecting optimal start-up designs to enhance the efficiency and reliability of adaptive clinical trials.