Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 12, 2026
Modified Posterior Vertebral Column Resection for Patients with Thoracolumbar Kyphotic Deformity
Published on: September 16, 2022
Adult Spinal Deformity Patients Recall Fewer Than 50% of the Risks Discussed in the Informed Consent Process
Rajiv Saigal1, Aaron J Clark, Justin K Scheer
1*Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA †University of California San Diego, School of Medicine, San Diego, CA ‡Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA §Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children, Denver, CO ¶Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Baylor Scoliosis Center, Plano, TX ‖Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR **Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD ††Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, Davis, CA ‡‡Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; and §§Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, NY.
Study Design:
Recall of the informed consent process in patients undergoing adult spinal deformity surgery and their family members was investigated prospectively.
Objective:
To quantify the percentage recall of the most common complications discussed during the informed consent process in adult spinal deformity surgery, assess for differences between patients and family members, and correlate with mental status.
Summary Of Background Data:
Given high rates of complications in adult spinal deformity surgery, it is critical to shared decision making that patients are adequately informed about risks and are able to recall preoperative discussion of possible complications to mitigate medical legal risk.
Methods:
Patients undergoing adult spinal deformity surgery underwent an augmented informed consent process involving both verbal and video explanations. Recall of the 11 most common complications was scored. Mental status was assessed with the mini-mental status examination-brief version. Patients subjectively scored the informed consent process and video. After surgery, the recall test and mini-mental status examination-brief version were readministered at 5 additional time points: hospital discharge, 6 to 8 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively. Family members were assessed at the first 3 time points for comparison.
Results:
Fifty-six patients enrolled. Despite ranking the consent process as important (median overall score: 10/10; video score: 9/10), median patient recall was only 45% immediately after discussion and video re-enforcement and subsequently declined to 18% at 6 to 8 weeks and 1 year postoperatively. Median family recall trended higher at 55% immediately and 36% at 6 to 8 weeks postoperatively. The perception of the severity of complications significantly differs between patient and surgeon. Mental status scores showed a transient, significant decrease from preoperation to discharge but were significantly higher at 1 year.
Conclusion:
Despite being well-informed in an optimized informed consent process, patients cannot recall most surgical risks discussed and recall declines over time. Significant progress remains to improve informed consent retention.
Level Of Evidence:
3.
More Related Videos
04:19Minimally Invasive Treatment for Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture Using Sagittal Alignment Screws and A Trauma Reduction Device
Published on: November 8, 2024
04:33Spinal Hernia Repair and Cauda Equina Repositioning After Lumbar Decompression under Three-Dimensional Microscopy: A Case Report and Literature Review
Published on: November 8, 2024
Related Concept Videos
01:16Spinal Cord: Cross-sectional Anatomy
Gray Matter and its Components
Central to the gray matter is...
01:23Spinal Nerves: Anatomy
There are 31 bilateral pairs of spinal nerves, each emerging from the spinal cord through the intervertebral foramina—openings between adjacent vertebrae. These nerves are...
01:15Spinal Cord: Gross Anatomy