Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 12, 2026

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
Challenges to undertaking randomised trials with looked after children in social care settings
Gillian Mezey1, Fiona Robinson2, Rona Campbell3
1Population Health Research Institute (PHRI), St Georges University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London, SW17 ORE, England. gmezey@sgul.ac.uk.
Insights
Conducting randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in social care for looked-after children presents significant challenges. Barriers include social worker gatekeeping, resource limitations, and difficulties engaging vulnerable youth in research.
Area of Science:
- Social Care Research
- Child Welfare Studies
- Public Health Interventions
Background:
- Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are standard in health research but often deemed unsuitable for social care.
- Looked-after children are a particularly vulnerable group where RCTs face unique obstacles.
Purpose of the Study:
- To describe challenges in a pilot study and RCT of a peer mentoring intervention.
- To reduce teenage pregnancy among looked-after children in a social care setting.
Main Methods:
- Qualitative interviews with social care professionals and looked-after children.
- Quantitative survey with looked-after children to assess feasibility and acceptability.
Main Results:
- Identified barriers: social workers as gatekeepers, misconceptions about recruitment and randomization.
- Resource limitations hindered research prioritization.
- Difficulties engaging and retaining looked-after children were noted.
Conclusions:
- Social care lacks robust research infrastructure and funding compared to health.
- This impacts evidence-based practice, especially for vulnerable youth.
- Addressing these gaps is crucial for improving outcomes in social care.
Background:
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are widely viewed as the gold standard for assessing effectiveness in health research; however many researchers and practitioners believe that RCTs are inappropriate and un-doable in social care settings, particularly in relation to looked after children. The aim of this article is to describe the challenges faced in conducting a pilot study and phase II RCT of a peer mentoring intervention to reduce teenage pregnancy in looked after children in a social care setting.
Methods:
Interviews were undertaken with social care professionals and looked after children, and a survey conducted with looked after children, to establish the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention and research design.
Results:
Barriers to recruitment and in managing the intervention were identified, including social workers acting as informal gatekeepers; social workers concerns and misconceptions about the recruitment criteria and the need for and purpose of randomisation; resource limitations, which made it difficult to prioritise research over other demands on their time and difficulties in engaging and retaining looked after children in the study.
Conclusions:
The relative absence of a research infrastructure and culture in social care and the lack of research support funding available for social care agencies, compared to health organisations, has implications for increasing evidence-based practice in social care settings, particularly in this very vulnerable group of young people.
Related Concept Videos
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...
Blinding
Group Design
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Naturalistic Observations
Blind Procedures

