Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals01:19

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

10.6K
A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
10.6K
Confidence Intervals01:21

Confidence Intervals

11.3K
An unbiased point estimate is often insufficient to predict a population estimate, such as population mean or population proportion. In this scenario, a confidence interval is used. A confidence interval is an estimate similar to a  sample proportion. However, unlike the point estimate which is a single value, the confidence interval  contains a range of values. These values have lower and upper limits, known as confidence limits, and can be designated as L1 and L2, respectively.
A...
11.3K
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

12.6K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
12.6K
Confidence Coefficient01:24

Confidence Coefficient

11.1K
The confidence coefficient is also known as the confidence level or degree of confidence. It is the percent expression for the probability, 1-α, that the confidence interval contains the true population parameter assuming that the confidence interval is obtained after sufficient unbiased sampling; for example, if the CL = 90%, then in 90 out of 100 samples the interval estimate will enclose the true population parameter. Here α is the area under the curve, distributed equally under...
11.1K
Prediction Intervals01:03

Prediction Intervals

3.6K
The interval estimate of any variable is known as the prediction interval. It helps decide if a point estimate is dependable.
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y. 
3.6K
Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean01:25

Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean

9.4K
A point estimate of the population mean is obtained from a single sample. Such a point estimate does not represent a population well because it needs to account for variability in the population. Single point estimate can also be biased despite the sample being selected randomly. Thus, a point estimate is often unreliable. A confidence interval is needed to reduce this unreliability.
A confidence interval for the mean is a range of values that provides an estimate of the population mean. As the...
9.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Hearing Impairments in People With Intellectual Disabilities: A Prospective Cohort Study on Prevalence and Healthcare Utilization.

Deutsches Arzteblatt international·2026
Same author

Effectiveness of an online interval group therapy for children with developmental language disorders: protocol for a randomised controlled intervention study.

BMJ open·2026
Same author

Clinical Diagnostics After Failed Hearing Screening in People With Intellectual Disabilities Do Not Often Take Place.

Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR·2026
Same author

Informative simultaneous confidence intervals for graphical test procedures.

Statistical methods in medical research·2025
Same author

ADDIS-Graphs for Online Error Control With Application to Platform Trials.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2025
Same author

Evaluating the Hearing-Related Quality of Life in People With Intellectual Disabilities.

Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR·2025
Same journal

Ensuring Quality in Preclinical Research: The Importance of Being Human.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2026
Same journal

Addressing Cluster-Level Treatment Effect Heterogeneity in Sample Size Determination for Hierarchical 2 × 2 Factorial Designs.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2026
Same journal

A Multiple Imputation Approach to Distinguish Curative From Life-Prolonging Effects in the Presence of Missing Covariates.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2026
Same journal

Tests for Categorical Data Beyond Pearson: A Distance Covariance and Energy Distance Approach.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2026
Same journal

Nonparametric Estimation of the Patient-Weighted While-Alive Estimand.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2026
Same journal

Two-Stage Multiple Test Procedures Controlling False Discovery Rate With Auxiliary Variable and Their Application to Set4 <math><semantics><mi>Δ</mi> <annotation>$\Delta$</annotation></semantics></math> Mutant Data.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 12, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.8K

Informative simultaneous confidence intervals for the fallback procedure.

Sylvia Schmidt1, Werner Brannath1

  • 1Competence Center for Clinical Trials, University of Bremen, Linzer Str. 4, 28359, Bremen, Germany.

Biometrical Journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift
|May 8, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces an improved fallback procedure for dose-finding studies, ensuring all rejected hypotheses provide informative results. The new method avoids noninformative rejections, enhancing statistical analysis in clinical trials.

Keywords:
Confidence intervalFallback procedureFamily wise error rateSimultaneous coverage probability

More Related Videos

Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness
07:37

Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness

Published on: August 1, 2017

9.7K
Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke
05:21

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke

Published on: January 7, 2019

6.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 12, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.8K
Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness
07:37

Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness

Published on: August 1, 2017

9.7K
Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke
05:21

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke

Published on: January 7, 2019

6.4K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trial Design
  • Statistical Inference

Background:

  • Hierarchical test procedures are common in clinical trials but can be rigid.
  • Existing extensions of the fallback procedure for simultaneous confidence intervals may lead to noninformative rejections.
  • Noninformative rejections offer no useful information about the true effect parameter.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a modified fallback procedure with simultaneous confidence intervals that guarantees informative rejections.
  • To address the drawback of noninformative rejections in existing methods.
  • To provide a statistically sound and informative approach for dose-finding studies.

Main Methods:

  • Modification of the fallback procedure by splitting statistical levels between null and alternative hypotheses.
  • Development of corresponding simultaneous confidence intervals.
  • Implementation via an explicit algorithm and graphical representation.

Main Results:

  • The proposed informative fallback procedure completely removes the issue of noninformative rejections.
  • Simulations demonstrate the effectiveness in dose-finding clinical trials.
  • Power loss associated with the method can be managed through careful study planning.

Conclusions:

  • The informative fallback procedure offers a superior alternative to existing methods for dose-finding studies.
  • It ensures that all rejected hypotheses yield meaningful statistical information.
  • This advancement improves the interpretability and utility of confidence intervals in clinical trial analysis.