Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 12, 2026

Modeling Primary Bone Tumors and Bone Metastasis with Solid Tumor Graft Implantation into Bone
Published on: September 9, 2020
Translational value of mouse models in oncology drug development
Stephen E Gould1, Melissa R Junttila1, Frederic J de Sauvage1
1Department of Molecular Oncology at Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA.
Abstract:
Much has been written about the advantages and disadvantages of various oncology model systems, with the overall finding that these models lack the predictive power required to translate preclinical efficacy into clinical activity. Despite assertions that some preclinical model systems are superior to others, no single model can suffice to inform preclinical target validation and molecule selection. This perspective provides a balanced albeit critical view of these claims of superiority and outlines a framework for the proper use of existing preclinical models for drug testing and discovery. We also highlight gaps in oncology mouse models and discuss general and pervasive model-independent shortcomings in preclinical oncology work, and we propose ways to address these issues.
Insights
Current oncology models struggle to predict clinical success, and no single system is sufficient for drug discovery. This perspective offers a framework for better preclinical model use and addresses inherent limitations in cancer research.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Translational Research
- Drug Discovery
Background:
- Preclinical oncology models are crucial for drug development but often lack predictive power for clinical outcomes.
- Claims of superiority among different model systems are common, yet no single model adequately informs target validation or molecule selection.
- Existing models have limitations that hinder the translation of preclinical efficacy to clinical activity.
Purpose of the Study:
- To critically evaluate claims of superiority for various oncology model systems.
- To propose a framework for the appropriate utilization of preclinical models in drug testing and discovery.
- To identify and discuss gaps and model-independent shortcomings in preclinical oncology research.
Main Methods:
- Perspective-based analysis of existing literature and common practices in oncology model systems.
- Critical review of assertions regarding the predictive power of preclinical models.
- Identification of limitations in current oncology mouse models and general preclinical research.
Main Results:
- No single preclinical oncology model system is adequate for comprehensive drug discovery and target validation.
- Existing models possess inherent limitations that impede the translation of preclinical findings to clinical efficacy.
- Significant gaps and model-independent shortcomings exist in current preclinical oncology research.
Conclusions:
- A balanced and critical approach to preclinical model selection and utilization is necessary.
- A framework for the proper use of existing models can improve preclinical drug testing and discovery.
- Addressing model-independent shortcomings and gaps is essential for advancing oncology drug development.
More Related Videos
07:44Translationally-Relevant Tumor Resection Model for Murine Preclinical Models of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Published on: April 3, 2026
09:43Transplantation of Zebrafish Pediatric Brain Tumors into Immune-competent Hosts for Long-term Study of Tumor Cell Behavior and Drug Response
Published on: May 17, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Mouse Models of Cancer Study
The development of transgenic, knockout, and knock-in mice has led to an exponential increase in their use as model organisms in research,...
Mouse Models of Cancer Study