Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 12, 2026

Postconditioning with Lactate-enriched Blood for Cardioprotection in ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Published on: May 28, 2019
Current controversies in PCI pharmacotherapy
1The Zena and Michael A., Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew York, NY, USA - roxana.mehran@mountsinai.org.
Insights
Optimizing antithrombotic therapy for coronary artery disease patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) requires balancing efficacy and bleeding risk. Individualized treatment strategies are crucial for improving outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
- Vascular Biology
Background:
- Coronary artery disease (CAD) and atherothrombosis involve complex interactions of anatomical, cellular, and molecular factors.
- Revascularization partially addresses ischemic heart disease; pharmacological therapies targeting atherothrombosis are essential for preventing complications.
- Antithrombotic therapies aim to balance anti-thrombotic efficacy with bleeding risk, a challenge in clinical practice.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review current debates and controversies in acute and chronic anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapies for patients undergoing PCI.
- To emphasize the need for individualized pharmacotherapy selection based on ischemic and hemorrhagic risk.
- To highlight the importance of optimizing antithrombotic strategies in the context of PCI.
Main Methods:
- Review of current literature on antithrombotic pharmacotherapies.
- Analysis of the interplay between pharmacological agents, CAD phenotype, and comorbidities.
- Discussion of individualized risk assessment for PCI pharmacotherapy selection.
Main Results:
- Optimal antithrombotic therapy presents a complex challenge due to the need to maximize efficacy while minimizing bleeding risk.
- Patient-specific factors, including clinical phenotype and comorbidities, significantly influence treatment decisions.
- A shift towards customized patient care is necessary given the availability of diverse pharmacologic agents and diagnostic tools.
Conclusions:
- Individualized evaluation of ischemic and hemorrhagic risk is paramount for selecting optimal acute and chronic PCI pharmacotherapy.
- Antithrombotic therapy selection requires careful consideration of potency, duration, and adherence.
- Effective management of atherothrombosis necessitates a tailored approach to antithrombotic treatment in PCI patients.
Abstract:
Coronary artery disease and atherothrombosis are complex pathologic entities. The intricate interplay between anatomical, cellular and molecular factors characterizes their pathogenesis and determines their clinical manifestations. Coronary artery revascularization strategies, by restoring myocardial blood perfusion, only partially treat ischemic heart disease in its complexity. Pharmacological therapies targeting molecular and cellular components involved in the pathophysiology of atherothrombosis are mandatory in order to prevent cardiovascular complications during and after revascularization and therefore improve clinical outcomes. The developments of antithrombotic pharmacotherapies occurred as a result of an improved understanding of the mechanisms underlying atherothrombotic disease. Unfortunately, the optimal antithrombotic therapy, in both acute and chronic settings, often set significant challenges in daily practice. The main objective of optimal antithrombotic therapies, targeting coagulation factors or the platelet system, is to maximize the anti-thrombotic efficacy while minimizing the bleeding risk. The subtle balance between ischemic and bleeding risk is a complex clinical conundrum that involves pharmacologic factors, the clinical phenotype of coronary artery disease and patient's clinical comorbidities. In a contemporary era, in which a broad armamentarium of pharmacologic agents and diagnostic tools are available, physician practice should shift toward a progressively more customized patient care. For this purpose, selection of the optimal acute and chronic percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) pharmacotherapy, in terms of potency, duration and adherence, cannot disregard an individualized and careful evaluation of the patient's ischemic and hemorrhagic risk. It is within this context that in the present review article we sought to expose the current topics of debate and controversies in acute and chronic anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapies in patients undergoing PCI.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Treatment for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Prostacyclin Receptor Agonists
These agonists bind to the IPR receptor situated on the plasma membrane of the pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells. This binding triggers a cascade of reactions known as the GS-AC-cAMP-PKA pathway. This pathway results in the relaxation of smooth muscle...
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Antianginal Drugs: Calcium Channel Blockers and Ranolazine
CCBs, a diverse class that includes dihydropyridines (nifedipine) and diphenylalkylamines (verapamil and diltiazem), exert their effect by blocking calcium channels in cardiac and smooth muscle cells. This...
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Treatment for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors and Calcium Channel Blockers
TKIs, such as imatinib (Gleevec), are particularly effective in tackling the growth and mitogenic factors that become upregulated in PAH patients. These factors contribute to the...
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care

