Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 12, 2026

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Long-Term Health Impacts of Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection on Offspring
Published on: May 17, 2024
First trimester gestational diabetes screening - Change in incidence and pharmacotherapy need
Marisa L Alunni1, Hilary A Roeder1, Thomas R Moore1
1UC San Diego Health System, Department of Reproductive Medicine, Division of Perinatology, 200 West Arbor Drive - MC 8433, San Diego, CA 92103, United States.
Insights
Early gestational diabetes (GDM) screening nearly doubled diagnosis rates. While early screening increased pharmacotherapy needs, body mass index (BMI) was the key predictor, with no impact on neonatal outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Endocrinology
- Perinatal Medicine
Background:
- Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) diagnosis and management are critical for maternal and infant health.
- Current screening protocols vary, impacting diagnosis rates and subsequent treatment needs.
- The International Association of Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) and California Diabetes and Pregnancy Program recommend specific screening guidelines.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) diagnosis rates between standard two-step screening and early screening methods.
- To evaluate differences in pharmacotherapy requirements for GDM diagnosed via early versus standard screening.
- To assess the impact of early GDM screening on perinatal outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective study of singleton pregnancies between July 2010 and June 2012.
- Comparison of two cohorts: standard two-step screening versus early screening (HbA1c ≥5.7% or fasting plasma glucose (FPG) ≥92 mg/dL at ≤24 weeks, or 2-h oral glucose tolerance test (GTT) between 24-28 weeks).
- Analysis included GDM diagnosis rates, pharmacotherapy needs, and neonatal outcomes (birth weight, macrosomia).
Main Results:
- Early screening diagnosed GDM in 9.4% of patients, compared to 5.3% with two-step screening.
- Pharmacotherapy was required in 49.2% (HbA1c), 66.7% (FPG), and 78.9% (HbA1c and FPG) of early-screened GDM cases, versus 30.6% for those diagnosed via 2-h GTT (p<0.001).
- Body mass index (BMI) was the strongest predictor of pharmacotherapy need (aOR 1.13). No significant differences were observed in mean birth weight or macrosomia rates between the groups.
Conclusions:
- Implementing early GDM screening significantly increases diagnosis rates.
- Early screening is associated with higher pharmacotherapy requirements, with BMI being a key predictive factor.
- Early GDM screening did not adversely affect neonatal outcomes such as birth weight or macrosomia.
Aims:
Adopting recommendations of the International Association of Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) and the California Diabetes and Pregnancy Program, our institution implemented early gestational diabetes (GDM) screening. Our objective was to compare GDM diagnosis rates using the standard two-step approach versus early screening, and secondarily to compare pharmacotherapy needs and perinatal outcomes.
Methods:
This retrospective study included singleton pregnancies diagnosed between 7/2010 and 6/2012. Two cohorts were compared; those diagnosed via two-step screening versus early screening diagnosis: HbA1c≥5.7% (39 mmol/mol) or fasting plasma glucose (FPG)≥92 mg/dL at ≤24 weeks gestation, or an abnormal 2-h oral glucose tolerance test (GTT) between 24 and 28 weeks. We calculated the rate of diagnosis, analyzed the need for pharmacotherapy, and reviewed neonatal outcomes.
Results:
A total of 2652 patients were screened. GDM was diagnosed in 5.3% with two-step screening and 9.4% with early screening. Of those diagnosed via early screening with HbA1c, FPG, or both HbA1c and FPG, 49.2%, 66.7%, and 78.9% respectively required pharmacotherapy. In contrast, of those diagnosed with a 2-h GTT, 30.6% required pharmacotherapy (p<0.001). When controlling for confounders in a multivariable regression, BMI is most predictive of medication requirements (aOR 1.13, 95% CI 1.08-1.18, p<0.001). There were no differences in mean birth weight (3240±619 g vs. 3179±573 g, p=0.51) and macrosomia rates (7% vs. 2.5%, p=0.12).
Conclusion:
Implementing early screening nearly doubled the incidence of GDM. Patients with early screening had a greater need for pharmacotherapy, but BMI was the best predictor of this outcome. There was no significant difference in neonatal outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 and Gestational
Pathophysiology of Diabetes
Type 1 diabetes is characterized by autoimmune-mediated destruction of pancreatic β cells, with environmental factors potentially triggering this process in genetically susceptible individuals. Despite many not having a family history, certain genes increase susceptibility,...
Diabetes: Management and Pharmacotherapy
Insulin remains the cornerstone of treatment for most patients with type 1 and many...
Oral Hypoglycemic Agents: Biguanides and Glitazones
Diabetes: Symptoms, Diagnosis, and Complications
Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibitors

