Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 12, 2026

Rapid Screening of HIV Reverse Transcriptase and Integrase Inhibitors
Published on: April 9, 2014
Outcomes, costs and cost-effectiveness of treating hepatitis C with direct acting antivirals
Jona T Stahmeyer1, Siegbert Rossol2, Christian Krauth1
1Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine & Health Systems Research, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany.
Abstract:
Hepatitis C is a global public health burden. Long-term consequences are the development of liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Introduction of different direct acting antivirals targeting the hepatitis C proteins has considerably increased rates of sustained viral response. First active substances introduced in 2011 were NS3/4A protease inhibitors telaprevir and boceprevir. In 2013/2014 the second generation of direct acting antivirals sofosbuvir, simeprevir, daclatasvir, ledipasvir and 3D therapy containing ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir and dasabuvir followed. This review focuses on treatment outcomes and costs of introduced direct acting antivirals. We provide an overview on SVR-rates in clinical trials and clinical practice, treatment costs in different countries as well as results of cost-effectiveness analyses for different treatment strategies.
Insights
Direct-acting antivirals for Hepatitis C virus (HCV) significantly improve sustained viral response (SVR) rates. This review examines treatment outcomes, costs, and cost-effectiveness of these transformative direct-acting antiviral therapies.
Area of Science:
- Hepatology
- Virology
- Pharmacoeconomics
Background:
- Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection poses a significant global health challenge, leading to severe liver conditions like cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma.
- Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) have revolutionized HCV treatment, targeting viral proteins to achieve high sustained viral response (SVR) rates.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the treatment outcomes, including SVR rates in clinical trials and real-world practice, of direct-acting antivirals for Hepatitis C.
- To analyze the costs associated with different DAAs across various countries.
- To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of various DAA treatment strategies.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review of published clinical trial data on SVR rates.
- Analysis of reported treatment costs for DAAs in different international markets.
- Review of cost-effectiveness analyses comparing various DAA regimens.
Main Results:
- DAAs have demonstrated high SVR rates in both clinical trials and real-world settings, marking a significant advancement in HCV therapy.
- Treatment costs for DAAs vary considerably by country, impacting accessibility and healthcare system burden.
- Cost-effectiveness analyses indicate that DAAs are generally cost-effective, particularly when considering the long-term benefits of preventing liver disease progression.
Conclusions:
- Direct-acting antivirals represent a highly effective treatment modality for Hepatitis C, achieving high cure rates.
- The economic impact of DAAs necessitates careful consideration of pricing and reimbursement strategies to ensure equitable access.
- Investing in DAA therapy is often cost-effective in the long term due to the prevention of severe liver-related morbidity and mortality.
Related Concept Videos
Hepatitis
Retrovirus Life Cycles
Inhibitors of Viral Protein Synthesis
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Pathophysiologic Assessment and Liver Function Test
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Drug Dosing and Hepatic Blood Flow
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Dose Adjustments Due to Hepatic Impairment

