Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 12, 2026

An Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy Designed to Minimize Anastomotic Complications and Optimize Conduit Function
Published on: April 17, 2020
Esophageal stenting in caustic injuries: a modified technique to avoid laparotomy
Ali Sina Shahi1, Behnoosh Behdad, Alireza Esmaeili
1School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
A modified laparoscopic technique for esophageal stenting in caustic injuries is as effective as the conventional laparotomy method. This minimally invasive approach avoids laparotomy, offering comparable outcomes for patients with esophageal burns.
Area of Science:
- Gastroenterology
- Surgical Innovation
- Esophageal Diseases
Background:
- Caustic esophageal injuries can lead to severe stenosis, necessitating interventions like esophageal stenting.
- Conventional stenting often involves laparotomy, a procedure with significant associated morbidity.
- Minimally invasive techniques are increasingly explored to improve patient outcomes in esophageal surgery.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy and safety of a modified laparoscopic intraluminal stenting technique versus the conventional laparatomic approach for managing esophageal caustic injuries.
- To evaluate outcomes including mortality, complications, and functional recovery after stenting in patients with esophageal burns.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective analysis of 103 patients with esophageal caustic injuries who underwent stenting.
- Patients were divided into two groups: modified laparoscopic intraluminal stenting (52 patients) and conventional laparotomy stenting (51 patients).
- Outcomes such as mortality, esophageal strictures, gastric outlet obstruction, and gastro-esophageal reflux were compared at a 3-month follow-up.
Main Results:
- Two perioperative mortalities occurred, one in each group.
- Functional recovery was similar, with most patients returning to normal intake.
- Complication rates for esophageal strictures and gastric outlet obstruction were not significantly different between the groups (p > 0.05).
- No significant gastro-esophageal reflux was observed in either group based on DeMeester scores (p > 0.05).
Conclusions:
- The modified laparoscopic intraluminal stenting technique achieves comparable efficacy to the conventional laparotomy method for esophageal caustic injuries.
- This minimally invasive approach eliminates the need for laparotomy, aligning with surgical guidelines advocating for laparoscopic procedures.
- The modified technique is recommended for patients with caustic esophageal injuries, offering a less invasive alternative with similar outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Peptic Ulcer Disease V: Surgical Management and Nursing Care
Surgical Interventions for Peptic Ulcer Disease
Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
Clinical Manifestations:
Esophageal Strictures-II: Clinical Features and Management
Healthcare providers should gather a comprehensive medical history and conduct a physical examination for diagnosis. If esophageal stricture is...
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
Esophageal Strictures-I: Introduction
Etiology
The primary cause of esophageal strictures is long-standing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), accounting for about 70 to 80% of adult cases. Chronic acid reflux can lead to injury and scarring of the esophageal lining, culminating in...
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation V: Advanced Airway Management Techniques

