Cost-effectiveness analysis of parenteral antimicrobials for acute melioidosis in Thailand

Viriya Hantrakun1, Wirongrong Chierakul2, Ploenchan Chetchotisakd3

  • 1Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit (MORU), Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand viriya@tropmedres.ac.

Abstract

Insights

Meropenem may be a cost-effective treatment for severe melioidosis (a serious infectious disease) in Thailand, potentially reducing mortality. However, evidence for its use in non-severe cases is still needed.

Area of Science:

  • Infectious Diseases
  • Health Economics
  • Pharmacoeconomics

Background:

  • Melioidosis is a prevalent community-acquired infection in northeast Thailand with high mortality rates.
  • Current treatment guidelines recommend ceftazidime, but meropenem is increasingly used without sufficient supporting evidence.
  • Severe melioidosis cases have mortality exceeding 70%.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of meropenem versus ceftazidime for treating suspected acute melioidosis.
  • To compare treatment strategies for both non-severe and severe cases.

Main Methods:

  • A decision tree model was employed to analyze cost-effectiveness.
  • The model assessed treatment outcomes for suspected acute melioidosis.

Main Results:

  • Meropenem is likely cost-effective for severe melioidosis if it reduces mortality by at least 9% and culture-confirmed cases exceed 20%.
  • Cost-effectiveness for non-severe melioidosis treatment with meropenem remains undetermined.

Conclusions:

  • Meropenem is likely a cost-effective option for treating severe suspected melioidosis in this region.
  • Further evidence is required to support the use of meropenem in non-severe suspected melioidosis cases.

Related Concept Videos

Antimicrobial Effectiveness01:28

Antimicrobial Effectiveness

The effectiveness of antimicrobial agents depends on various factors influencing their ability to eliminate microbial populations. Larger microbial populations require more time for complete eradication, emphasizing the importance of population size analysis when evaluating antimicrobial efficacy.Microbial resistance to antimicrobial agents varies significantly. Highly resilient microorganisms include endospores, gram-negative bacteria, and non-enveloped viruses, while prions are exceptionally...
2.1K
Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Stability-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence01:22

Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Stability-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence

Generic intravenous (IV) drugs are considered bioequivalent to their branded counterparts due to their 100% bioavailability upon administration. However, variations in stability among different drug products can significantly influence their therapeutic performance, even if they are pharmaceutically equivalent.Cefuroxime, a prophylactic antimicrobial, is often used as a single-dose IV injection for patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. A 3 g dose typically provides...
248
Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Resistance01:25

Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Resistance

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) presents a critical public health threat, arising from its capacity to resist β-lactam antibiotics due to acquisition of the mecA gene within the staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec). This gene encodes penicillin-binding protein 2a (PBP2a), which impairs binding efficacy of methicillin and other β-lactams. MRSA has evolved into distinct clonal lineages impacting humans and animals alike, reinforcing its significance within...
54