Cost-effectiveness analysis of parenteral antimicrobials for acute melioidosis in Thailand
Viriya Hantrakun1, Wirongrong Chierakul2, Ploenchan Chetchotisakd3
1Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit (MORU), Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand viriya@tropmedres.ac.
Background:
Melioidosis is a common community-acquired infectious disease in northeast Thailand associated with overall mortality of approximately 40% in hospitalized patients, and over 70% in severe cases. Ceftazidime is recommended for parenteral treatment in patients with suspected melioidosis. Meropenem is increasingly used but evidence to support this is lacking.
Methods:
A decision tree was used to estimate the cost-effectiveness of treating non-severe and severe suspected acute melioidosis cases with either ceftazidime or meropenem.
Results:
Empirical treatment with meropenem is likely to be cost-effective providing meropenem reduces mortality in severe cases by at least 9% and the proportion with subsequent culture-confirmed melioidosis is over 20%.
Conclusions:
In this context, treatment of severe cases with meropenem is likely to be cost-effective, while the evidence to support the use of meropenem in non-severe suspected melioidosis is not yet available.
Insights
Meropenem may be a cost-effective treatment for severe melioidosis (a serious infectious disease) in Thailand, potentially reducing mortality. However, evidence for its use in non-severe cases is still needed.
Area of Science:
- Infectious Diseases
- Health Economics
- Pharmacoeconomics
Background:
- Melioidosis is a prevalent community-acquired infection in northeast Thailand with high mortality rates.
- Current treatment guidelines recommend ceftazidime, but meropenem is increasingly used without sufficient supporting evidence.
- Severe melioidosis cases have mortality exceeding 70%.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of meropenem versus ceftazidime for treating suspected acute melioidosis.
- To compare treatment strategies for both non-severe and severe cases.
Main Methods:
- A decision tree model was employed to analyze cost-effectiveness.
- The model assessed treatment outcomes for suspected acute melioidosis.
Main Results:
- Meropenem is likely cost-effective for severe melioidosis if it reduces mortality by at least 9% and culture-confirmed cases exceed 20%.
- Cost-effectiveness for non-severe melioidosis treatment with meropenem remains undetermined.
Conclusions:
- Meropenem is likely a cost-effective option for treating severe suspected melioidosis in this region.
- Further evidence is required to support the use of meropenem in non-severe suspected melioidosis cases.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Antimicrobial Effectiveness
Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Stability-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence
Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Resistance


