Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 31, 2026

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study
Published on: February 2, 2017
An analysis of birth weight by gestational age in Canada
1Surveillance and Risk Assessment Division, Laboratory Centre for Disease Control, Ottawa, Ont.
Insights
New Canadian birth-weight standards for newborns were developed using 1972 and 1986 data. These updated standards aid in identifying intrauterine growth issues for singleton and twin infants, by sex.
Area of Science:
- Pediatrics
- Neonatology
- Public Health
Background:
- Accurate birth-weight-gestational-age standards are crucial for identifying infants requiring specialized care and for understanding intrauterine growth retardation.
- Existing standards were often limited by small sample sizes, outdated data, or lack of specificity regarding birth type and infant sex.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop current, population-based Canadian birth-weight-gestational-age standards specific to birth type (singleton/twin) and sex.
- To compare birth weight data from 1972 and 1986 to assess changes and establish updated reference ranges.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of live birth data from Canada for the years 1972 and 1986.
- Calculation of 10th, 50th, and 90th percentile birth weights stratified by gestational age, birth type, and sex.
Main Results:
- For term deliveries (≥37 weeks gestation), percentile birth weights were slightly higher in 1986 compared to 1972.
- For preterm deliveries (<37 weeks gestation), birth weight percentiles remained largely unchanged between 1972 and 1986.
- Updated standards were established for singleton and twin infants, differentiated by sex.
Conclusions:
- The developed Canadian standards provide a reliable, up-to-date reference for assessing infant growth.
- These standards will improve clinicians' ability to accurately diagnose and manage deviations in intrauterine growth, whether retardation or acceleration.
Abstract:
Birth-weight-gestational-age standards help to identify infants in need of special care and to determine causes and means for preventing retardation of intrauterine growth. Previously published standards either were based on small samples, data several decades old or characteristics of subpopulations in the United States or they were not specific for type of birth and sex. We compared the data for live births in 1972 with those in 1986 to develop current Canadian standards for type of birth (singleton or twin) and sex. We found that the 10th, 50th and 90th percentile figures for weight were slightly higher in 1986 than in 1972 for term deliveries (at 37 weeks' gestation or later), but the figures were virtually unchanged for preterm deliveries. The availability of reliable population-based standards should enhance the clinician's ability to identify true cases of retardation or acceleration of intrauterine growth.
Related Concept Videos
Regression Toward the Mean
Normal Distribution
z Scores and Area Under the Curve
Applications of Normal Distribution
The heights of 15 to 18-year-old males from Chile from 1984 to 1985 followed a normal distribution. The mean height is 172.36...
One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes
Two-Way ANOVA
The two-way ANOVA analysis initially begins by stating the null hypothesis that there is an interaction effect between the two factors of a dataset. This effect can be visualized using line segments formed by joining the means for...

