Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 12, 2026

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
Community-Based Review of Research Across Diverse Community Contexts: Key Characteristics, Critical Issues, and
Nancy Shore1, Angela Ford, Eric Wat
1Nancy Shore is with the School of Social Work, University of New England, Portland, ME. Angela Ford was with the University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA. Eric Wat is with Special Service for Groups, Los Angeles, CA. Missy Brayboy was with the North Carolina Commission of Indian Affairs, Raleigh. Mei-Ling Isaacs was with Papa Ola Lokahi, Honolulu, HI. Alice Park was with and Sarena D. Seifer is with Community-Campus Partnerships for Health, Seattle, WA. Hal Strelnick is with the Department of Family and Social Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY.
Community research review processes (CRPs) enhance health study ethics, relevance, and capacity. This analysis of 9 CRPs offers guidance for establishing new processes and improving existing ones for community benefit.
Area of Science:
- Community-based participatory research
- Health equity
- Research ethics
Background:
- Community-based organizations and academic partnerships increasingly implement community research review processes (CRPs).
- These CRPs aim to ensure health research is relevant, ethical, and beneficial to communities.
- Existing CRPs offer valuable models for community engagement in research governance.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the organization and function of existing community research review processes (CRPs).
- To provide guidance for communities seeking to establish their own CRPs.
- To offer recommendations for future research, practice, and policy related to CRPs.
Main Methods:
- Representatives from 9 CRPs across the United States convened for a working meeting in 2012.
- Models of CRP organization and function were presented and analyzed.
- Qualitative analysis of presented models to identify common themes and best practices.
Main Results:
- Diverse models of CRPs exist, varying in structure and function.
- Key components for successful CRPs include clear governance, community engagement, and ethical oversight.
- CRPs effectively enhance research relevance, cultural competence, and community capacity.
Conclusions:
- Community research review processes are vital for ethical and relevant health research.
- Guidance and best practices can support the establishment and optimization of CRPs.
- Further research and policy development are needed to support the sustainability and impact of CRPs.
More Related Videos
06:16Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
08:10Neuroimaging Field Methods Using Functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy NIRS Neuroimaging to Study Global Child Development: Rural Sub-Saharan Africa
Published on: February 2, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Ethics in Research
Impact of Social Context on Individuals
Cross-Sectional Research
Methods to Assess Microbial Communities
Archival Research