Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Working Memory01:24

Working Memory

1.3K
Working memory refers to a combination of components, including short-term memory and attention, that allow an individual to hold information temporarily as we perform cognitive tasks. It is an essential cognitive function that enables the execution of complex tasks such as problem-solving, comprehension, and reasoning. Unlike short-term memory, which simply involves the storage of information for a brief period, working memory involves the active manipulation and processing of this...
1.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ion Channels and Dry Eye Disease: From Physiological Functions to Targeted Therapeutic Mechanisms.

FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology·2026
Same author

Clinical efficacy of cryopreserved autologous bone flaps versus titanium plates for cranioplasty: a retrospective comparative study.

The International journal of neuroscience·2026
Same author

The N-terminal region of pdm09/H1N1 PA synergizes with its cognate NP to enhance mammalian adaptation of avian-origin H9N2 canine influenza virus.

Veterinary microbiology·2026
Same author

A reverse genetics-based NS1-truncated live attenuated vaccine confers broad heterologous protection against swine influenza viruses.

Microbial pathogenesis·2026
Same author

Assessment of right ventricular systolic function via the AutoStrain Right Ventricle technique in patients with ovarian cancer during early-stage chemotherapy.

Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery·2026
Same author

Risk factors analysis for extubation failure following mandibular distraction osteogenesis in infants with Pierre Robin sequence: a retrospective cohort study.

Frontiers in pediatrics·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 12, 2026

Utilizing Electroencephalography Measurements for Comparison of Task-Specific Neural Efficiencies: Spatial Intelligence Tasks
06:57

Utilizing Electroencephalography Measurements for Comparison of Task-Specific Neural Efficiencies: Spatial Intelligence Tasks

Published on: August 9, 2016

12.0K

Individual differences in working memory capacity are reflected in different ERP and EEG patterns to task difficulty.

Shanshan Dong1, Lynne M Reder2, Yuan Yao1

  • 1Bio-X Laboratory, Department of Physics, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China.

Brain Research
|May 16, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Neural differences in working memory (WM) capacity exist even at low task difficulty. High WM individuals show more efficient neural resource use for attention, regardless of cognitive demand.

Keywords:
Brain oscillationsEvent-related potentialsEvent-related synchronization/desynchronizationIndividual differencesWorking memory capacity

More Related Videos

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners
09:52

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners

Published on: May 31, 2018

8.2K
Event Related Potentials ERPs and other EEG Based Methods for Extracting Biomarkers of Brain Dysfunction: Examples from Pediatric Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder ADHD
10:02

Event Related Potentials ERPs and other EEG Based Methods for Extracting Biomarkers of Brain Dysfunction: Examples from Pediatric Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder ADHD

Published on: March 12, 2020

17.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 12, 2026

Utilizing Electroencephalography Measurements for Comparison of Task-Specific Neural Efficiencies: Spatial Intelligence Tasks
06:57

Utilizing Electroencephalography Measurements for Comparison of Task-Specific Neural Efficiencies: Spatial Intelligence Tasks

Published on: August 9, 2016

12.0K
How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners
09:52

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners

Published on: May 31, 2018

8.2K
Event Related Potentials ERPs and other EEG Based Methods for Extracting Biomarkers of Brain Dysfunction: Examples from Pediatric Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder ADHD
10:02

Event Related Potentials ERPs and other EEG Based Methods for Extracting Biomarkers of Brain Dysfunction: Examples from Pediatric Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder ADHD

Published on: March 12, 2020

17.0K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Neuroscience
  • Psychology

Background:

  • Individual differences in working memory (WM) capacity are well-documented.
  • Understanding the neural underpinnings of these differences is crucial for cognitive science.
  • Previous research has explored neural correlates of WM, but less is known about their manifestation across varying task demands.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify neural markers distinguishing individuals with high versus low working memory (WM) capacity.
  • To determine if these neural differences are evident only during demanding tasks or across all difficulty levels.
  • To investigate the relationship between neural activity and WM capacity independent of task difficulty.

Main Methods:

  • Assessed individual WM capacity using a modified digit span task.
  • Measured neural activity (event-related potentials - ERP, and event-related synchronization/desynchronization - ERS/ERD) during an N-back task with varying difficulty (1- to 4-back).
  • Compared electrophysiological responses between high and low WM groups.

Main Results:

  • Low WM individuals exhibited more errors and slower responses at higher cognitive loads compared to high WM individuals.
  • Significant differences in neural markers (P300 amplitude, theta ERS, alpha ERD) were observed between groups, even at the lowest task difficulty.
  • P300 amplitude and alpha ERD correlated with individual WM capacity irrespective of task difficulty.

Conclusions:

  • Qualitative neural differences exist among individuals with varying WM capacities during cognitive tasks.
  • High WM individuals may employ more efficient neural resource allocation to maintain focus on task-relevant information.
  • Neural markers of WM capacity are present across a range of cognitive demands, not solely during maximal challenge.