Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 12, 2026
Analysis of 18FDG PET/CT Imaging as a Tool for Studying Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection and Treatment in Non-human Primates
Published on: September 5, 2017
Differentiation of malignant tumours from granulomas by using dynamic [(18)F]-fluoro-L-α-methyltyrosine positron
Aiko Yamaguchi1, Hirofumi Hanaoka1, Yutaka Fujisawa2
1Department of Bioimaging Information Analysis, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-22 Showa-machi, Maebashi, Japan.
Background:
Previous clinical studies have revealed the potential of [(18)F]-fluoro-L-α-methyltyrosine ((18)F-FAMT) for the differential diagnosis of malignant tumours from sarcoidosis. However, one concern regarding the differential diagnosis with (18)F-FAMT is the possibility of false negatives given the small absolute uptake of (18)F-FAMT that has been observed in some malignant tumours. The aim of this study was to evaluate a usefulness of dynamic (18)F-FAMT positron emission tomography (PET) for differentiating malignant tumours from granulomas.
Methods:
Rats bearing both granulomas (Mycobacterium bovis bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG)-induced) and tumours (C6 glioma cell-induced) underwent dynamic 2-deoxy-2-[(18)F]-fluoro-D-glucose ((18)F-FDG) PET and (18)F-FAMT PET for 120 min on consecutive days. Time-activity curves, static images, mean standardized uptake values (SUVs) and the SUV ratios (SUVRs; calculated by dividing SUV at each time point by that of 2 min after injection) were assessed.
Results:
In tumours, (18)F-FAMT showed a shoulder peak immediately after the initial distribution followed by gradual clearance compared with granulomas. Although the mean SUV in the tumours (1.00 ± 0.10) was significantly higher than that in the granulomas (0.88 ± 0.12), a large overlap was observed. In contrast, the SUVR was markedly higher in tumours than in granulomas (50 min/2 min, 0.72 ± 0.06 and 0.56 ± 0.05, respectively) with no overlap. The dynamic patterns, SUVR, and mean SUV of (18)F-FDG in the granulomas were comparable to those in the tumours.
Conclusions:
Dynamic (18)F-FAMT and SUVR analysis might compensate for the current limitations and help in improving the diagnostic accuracy of (18)F-FAMT.
