Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 12, 2026

Single-Port Robotic-assisted Transaxillary Breast-conserving Surgery: A Prospective, Single-arm, Non-randomized Phase IIa Clinical Trial
Published on: August 19, 2025
A prospective comparative study of cosmetic satisfaction for three different surgical approaches
Taejong Song1, Jin-Young Park2, Tae-Joong Kim2
1Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Objectives:
To compare gynecologic patients' cosmetic satisfaction with surgical wounds after different approaches: laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS), conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) and open surgery (OS).
Study Design:
This was a prospective study. The primary outcome was the cosmetic satisfaction after LESS, CLS, or OS, measured at 1 and 6 months post-surgery using the well-validated Cosmetic Scale. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to determine whether the surgical approach was independently associated with cosmetic satisfaction or not.
Results:
Of 294 patients enrolled, 84 (28.6%), 129 (43.9%), and 81 patients (27.3%) underwent LESS, CLS, and OS, respectively. Cosmetic Scale scores in the LESS group at 1 month post-surgery was about 7 higher than in the CLS group and 9 higher than in the OS group (P<0.001). This difference was maintained also at 6 months post-surgery (P<0.001). On multiple linear regression analysis, the surgical approach was independently associated with postoperative cosmetic satisfaction (P<0.001).
Conclusion:
Our study found that cosmetic satisfaction after LESS was highest, followed by CLS, then OS. Therefore, physicians should more assertively discuss and consider LESS for gynecologic diseases.
More Related Videos
13:35Endoscopic Bilateral Nipple-sparing Mastectomy via a Single Axillary Incision with Immediate Pre-pectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction
Published on: May 17, 2024
06:26Quantitative Assessment Protocol for Facial Soft Tissue Volumetric Changes with Stereophotogrammetry
Published on: December 9, 2025