Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 12, 2026

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education
Published on: June 21, 2010
Ranking Surgical Residency Programs: Reputation Survey or Outcomes Measures?
Adam B Wilson1, Laura J Torbeck1, Gary L Dunnington1
1Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Residency program rankings based on reputation show only a moderate association with objective outcomes like board pass rates and publications. Objective measures are crucial for accurately assessing general surgery program quality.
Area of Science:
- Medical Education
- Surgical Training
- Program Evaluation
Background:
- Residency program rankings are increasingly influential in medical education.
- Existing rankings often rely on subjective measures like peer nominations.
- There is a need for objective, measurable standards to assess program quality.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the correlation between general surgery residency program rankings based on reputation and those based on objective outcomes.
- To determine if reputation is a reliable surrogate for overall program quality.
Main Methods:
- Collected publicly available data for 254 general surgery residency programs.
- Created an outcomes-based ranking using board pass rates and alumni publication prevalence.
- Utilized Kendall τ-b rank correlation to compare reputation-based and outcomes-based rankings.
Main Results:
- A moderate correlation (0.428) was found between reputation-based and outcomes-based rankings.
- Board pass rates averaged 72% (SD 14%) for 218 analyzed programs.
- 60 programs ranked in the top quartile for alumni publications.
Conclusions:
- Program reputation alone is insufficient to accurately represent program quality.
- Quantifiable indicators and unique program attributes should be prioritized in ranking systems.
- Caution is advised when interpreting and using current program rankings.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Nursing Evaluation
Kaplan-Meier Approach
Hospitals-II
Nurses that work in...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
