Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Predator-Prey Interactions02:39

Predator-Prey Interactions

22.3K
Predators consume prey for energy. Predators that acquire prey and prey that avoid predation both increase their chances of survival and reproduction (i.e., fitness). Routine predator-prey interactions elicit mutual adaptations that improve predator offenses, such as claws, teeth, and speed, as well as prey defenses, including crypsis, aposematism, and mimicry. Thus, predator-prey interactions resemble an evolutionary arms race.
22.3K
Distribution and Dispersion00:54

Distribution and Dispersion

26.0K
To understand intra-specific interactions in populations, scientists measure the spatial arrangement of species individuals. This geographic arrangement is known as the species distribution or dispersion. Highly territorial species exhibit a uniform distribution pattern, in which individuals are spaced at relatively equal distances from one another. Species that are highly tied to particular resources, such as food or shelter, tend to concentrate around those resources, and thus exhibit a...
26.0K
What are Populations and Communities?00:30

What are Populations and Communities?

38.7K
Overview
38.7K
Optimal Foraging00:48

Optimal Foraging

14.3K
How animals obtain and eat their food is called foraging behavior. Foraging can include searching for plants and hunting for prey and depends on the species and environment.
14.3K
Migration00:53

Migration

9.1K
Migration is long-range, seasonal movement from one region or habitat to another. This common strategy, carried out by many different organisms around the world, is an adaptive response that typically corresponds to changes in an organism’s environment, like resource availability or climate. Migrations can involve huge groups of thousands of animals as well as single individuals traveling alone and can range from thousands of kilometers to just a few hundred meters.
9.1K
Microbial Interactions: Predation01:28

Microbial Interactions: Predation

50
Microbial predation refers to the process by which one microorganism kills and consumes another to obtain nutrients and energy. It encompasses both bacterial and protozoan predators. This interaction plays a crucial role in shaping microbial communities and regulating nutrient cycling.Bacterial Predators: Epibiotic vs. EndobioticBacterial predators are classified based on their mode of attack as either epibiotic or endobiotic. Epibiotic predators, such as Vampirococcus, attach to the surface of...
50

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Shining a light on camouflage evolution: Using genetic algorithms to determine the effects of geometry and lighting on optimal camouflage.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Matching Multiple Backgrounds: Egg Camouflage Across Different Habitats in a Shorebird.

Ecology and evolution·2026
Same author

Parental Provisioning in an Urban Apex Predator.

Ecology and evolution·2025
Same author

A school-based intervention to improve mental health outcomes for children with cerebral visual impairment (CVI): feasibility cluster randomised trial.

Pilot and feasibility studies·2025
Same author

Fiddler crabs (Afruca tangeri) detect second-order motion in both intensity and polarization.

Communications biology·2024
Same author

No sex difference in preen oil chemical composition during incubation in Kentish plovers.

PeerJ·2024
Same journal

How distinct are sleep sites from active sites across habitat types in lizards?

Behavioral ecology and sociobiology·2026
Same journal

Forelimb stripe coloration signals age, but not physiological health, in painted turtles.

Behavioral ecology and sociobiology·2026
Same journal

Eurasian spoonbill chicks receive parental care up to several months after fledging, but not into migration.

Behavioral ecology and sociobiology·2025
Same journal

Familiarity mediated by body size predicts intraspecific aggression in farming damselfishes.

Behavioral ecology and sociobiology·2025
Same journal

No sensitive period for the development of individual face learning in <i>polistes fuscatus</i> wasps.

Behavioral ecology and sociobiology·2025
Same journal

Sociality does not predict signal complexity in response to playback in apteronotid weakly electric fishes.

Behavioral ecology and sociobiology·2025
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 12, 2026

A Real-Time Interactive System for Studying Confrontational Pursuit Behavior in Rodents
06:25

A Real-Time Interactive System for Studying Confrontational Pursuit Behavior in Rodents

Published on: May 16, 2025

1.7K

Moving in groups: how density and unpredictable motion affect predation risk.

Nicholas E Scott-Samuel1, Gavin Holmes2, Roland Baddeley1

  • 1School of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
|May 19, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Predation risk for animals in groups decreases with higher prey density, especially when movement is unpredictable. This confusion effect is driven by density, not just group size, impacting predator tracking ability.

Keywords:
AggregationConfusion effectGroup livingObject trackingPredation riskVisual search

More Related Videos

Boldness, Aggression, and Shoaling Assays for Zebrafish Behavioral Syndromes
08:43

Boldness, Aggression, and Shoaling Assays for Zebrafish Behavioral Syndromes

Published on: August 29, 2016

11.1K
Development of New Methods for Quantifying Fish Density Using Underwater Stereo-video Tools
09:32

Development of New Methods for Quantifying Fish Density Using Underwater Stereo-video Tools

Published on: November 20, 2017

9.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 12, 2026

A Real-Time Interactive System for Studying Confrontational Pursuit Behavior in Rodents
06:25

A Real-Time Interactive System for Studying Confrontational Pursuit Behavior in Rodents

Published on: May 16, 2025

1.7K
Boldness, Aggression, and Shoaling Assays for Zebrafish Behavioral Syndromes
08:43

Boldness, Aggression, and Shoaling Assays for Zebrafish Behavioral Syndromes

Published on: August 29, 2016

11.1K
Development of New Methods for Quantifying Fish Density Using Underwater Stereo-video Tools
09:32

Development of New Methods for Quantifying Fish Density Using Underwater Stereo-video Tools

Published on: November 20, 2017

9.9K

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral Ecology
  • Predator-Prey Dynamics
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • Group living in prey animals often confers a per capita survival advantage by reducing predation risk.
  • The 'confusion effect' — where predators struggle to target individuals in dense groups — is a key proposed mechanism.
  • Existing research suggests prey density, rather than absolute group number, may be more critical for this effect.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To experimentally investigate the relative importance of prey number and density on the confusion effect.
  • To examine how motion path predictability influences the confusion effect in predator-prey interactions.
  • To test the information processing bottleneck hypothesis for the confusion effect.

Main Methods:

  • A computer-based target tracking task was employed with human participants.
  • Independent manipulation of group number and density was performed in a factorial design.
  • Motion path predictability (predictable vs. unpredictable) was varied in combination with density and number.

Main Results:

  • Prey density, not the total number of individuals, was the primary driver of the confusion effect.
  • The confusion effect was significantly enhanced when prey movement paths were unpredictable.
  • Density and motion unpredictability acted synergistically to increase predator tracking difficulty.

Conclusions:

  • Prey density is a more critical factor than group size in mediating the confusion effect.
  • Unpredictable movement amplifies the confusion effect, suggesting combined importance for predator evasion.
  • The developed experimental paradigm can isolate factors influencing predation success in group-living prey.