Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 12, 2026

Standardized Induction and Assessment of Long-term Potentiation-like Cortical Plasticity Using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Published on: November 7, 2025
NIBS-driven brain plasticity.
Carmelo Chisari1, Chiara Fanciullacci, Giuseppe Lamola
1Unit of Neurorehabilitation, University Hospital of Pisa, Italy.
Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS), including transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), helps understand and modulate brain plasticity. These techniques show promise for neurorehabilitation and motor function recovery after brain injury.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Rehabilitation Medicine
- Neuromodulation
Background:
- The brain exhibits plasticity, enabling functional changes and reorganization after injury or environmental shifts.
- Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques, specifically transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), are increasingly utilized to study brain plasticity.
- Emerging evidence suggests TMS and tDCS as potential interventions to enhance neurorehabilitation and motor function recovery post-brain lesions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the application of NIBS in experimental protocols for assessing and modulating brain plasticity.
- To explore factors influencing inter-individual variability in response to NIBS.
- To discuss proposed mechanisms of action and challenges in translating NIBS findings from research to clinical practice.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of studies employing NIBS (TMS, tDCS) for brain plasticity evaluation and modulation.
- Analysis of factors contributing to response variability in NIBS.
- Examination of proposed neurobiological mechanisms underlying NIBS effects.
- Assessment of translational challenges in clinical neurorehabilitation.
Main Results:
- NIBS techniques provide valuable tools for investigating and influencing brain plasticity.
- Significant inter-individual variability exists in responses to NIBS, influenced by various factors.
- Understanding the mechanisms and variability is crucial for effective clinical application.
- Translating promising research findings into widespread clinical practice faces several hurdles.
Conclusions:
- NIBS, including TMS and tDCS, offers significant potential for understanding and manipulating brain plasticity.
- Further research is needed to optimize NIBS protocols and overcome translational barriers for neurorehabilitation.
- Addressing inter-individual variability is key to maximizing the therapeutic benefits of NIBS in clinical settings.
Related Concept Videos
Neuroplasticity
Plasticity
Long-term Potentiation
Hebbian LTP
LTP can occur when...
Long-term Potentiation
Brain Imaging
These technologies include computerized axial tomography (CAT or CT scans), positron-emission tomography (PET scans), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), and Transcranial Magnetic...
Neurogenesis and Regeneration of Nervous Tissue

