Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

1.7K
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
1.7K
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

26.3K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
26.3K
Investigation of Disease Outbreaks01:23

Investigation of Disease Outbreaks

58
Multistate foodborne outbreaks pose significant public health risks and require meticulous investigation to identify sources and implement control measures. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) utilizes a dynamic seven-step process for these investigations, integrating data from laboratories, interviews, and environmental assessments to protect public health.Outbreak Detection: The detection of multistate outbreaks typically begins with PulseNet, the CDC's national laboratory...
58
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

1.1K
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
1.1K
Bias01:22

Bias

8.0K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
8.0K
Scientific Nature of Social Psychology01:30

Scientific Nature of Social Psychology

773
Social psychology is a scientific discipline dedicated to understanding how individuals think, feel, and behave in social contexts. Unlike common sense, which relies on anecdotal experiences and intuition, social psychology employs systematic research and empirical methods to ensure objectivity and reliability. This distinction is fundamental in distinguishing scientifically supported findings from mere speculation.Four fundamental scientific values guide a structured approach to research in...
773

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

JAK2<sup>V617F</sup>-positive clonal hematopoiesis in germline BRCA1 versus BRCA2 mutation carriers.

Leukemia·2026
Same author

Spectrum of double heterozygosity in individuals diagnosed with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.

European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)·2026
Same author

Constitutional <i>BRCA1</i> Promoter Methylation in Patients With Ovarian Cancer: Results of the Observational AGO-TR1 Study.

JCO precision oncology·2026
Same author

Correction: Understanding digital health literacy in later life: the role of sociodemographic and health-related factors - a cross-sectional study.

BMC geriatrics·2026
Same author

Prevalence and associated factors of subjective cognitive decline (SCD Plus): a cross-sectional analysis of three population-based European cohorts.

Alzheimer's research & therapy·2026
Same author

Digital Health Literacy, Technology Acceptance, and Competence Among Older Adults Aged ≥65 Years: Cross-Sectional Study Investigating Differences Between Women and Men.

Journal of medical Internet research·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 12, 2026

An Open Source Technology Platform to Manufacture Hydrogel-Based 3D Culture Models in an Automated and Standardized Fashion
08:29

An Open Source Technology Platform to Manufacture Hydrogel-Based 3D Culture Models in an Automated and Standardized Fashion

Published on: March 31, 2022

5.0K

Scientific disintegrity as a public bad.

Christoph Engel1

  • 1Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods engel@coll.mpg.de.

Perspectives on Psychological Science : a Journal of the Association for Psychological Science
|May 20, 2015
PubMed
Summary

Scientific dishonesty stems from incentive problems, where individual gains from lax standards harm the collective scientific community. Policy interventions, including sanctions and enforcement, are crucial for maintaining research integrity and public trust.

Keywords:
incentivesinterventionpublic badscientific misconduct

More Related Videos

Cell Culture Techniques and Practices to Avoid Contamination by Fungi and Bacteria in the Research Cell Culture Laboratory
13:39

Cell Culture Techniques and Practices to Avoid Contamination by Fungi and Bacteria in the Research Cell Culture Laboratory

Published on: July 7, 2023

19.7K
A Method to Test the Efficacy of Handwashing for the Removal of Emerging Infectious Pathogens
09:02

A Method to Test the Efficacy of Handwashing for the Removal of Emerging Infectious Pathogens

Published on: June 7, 2017

19.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 12, 2026

An Open Source Technology Platform to Manufacture Hydrogel-Based 3D Culture Models in an Automated and Standardized Fashion
08:29

An Open Source Technology Platform to Manufacture Hydrogel-Based 3D Culture Models in an Automated and Standardized Fashion

Published on: March 31, 2022

5.0K
Cell Culture Techniques and Practices to Avoid Contamination by Fungi and Bacteria in the Research Cell Culture Laboratory
13:39

Cell Culture Techniques and Practices to Avoid Contamination by Fungi and Bacteria in the Research Cell Culture Laboratory

Published on: July 7, 2023

19.7K
A Method to Test the Efficacy of Handwashing for the Removal of Emerging Infectious Pathogens
09:02

A Method to Test the Efficacy of Handwashing for the Removal of Emerging Infectious Pathogens

Published on: June 7, 2017

19.9K

Area of Science:

  • Social Sciences
  • Economics
  • Science Policy

Background:

  • Scientific dishonesty poses a significant threat to research integrity and public trust.
  • Individual scientists may face incentives to compromise standards for personal gain.
  • Such compromises can negatively impact the scientific community's collective voice and funding.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze scientific dishonesty through the lens of economic incentive problems.
  • To explore the governance challenges and policy interventions related to scientific misconduct.
  • To examine the role of scientists' utility functions and societal perceptions in addressing misconduct.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizes a standard economic model, specifically the 'public bad' model.
  • Analyzes scientists' utility functions and their implications for adherence to standards.
  • Considers various policy interventions, including sanctions and enforcement mechanisms.

Main Results:

  • Scientific dishonesty arises from an incentive structure where individual utility can be increased by violating standards.
  • The collective impact of such violations includes diminished societal influence and reduced academic funding.
  • The effectiveness of policy interventions depends on societal valuation of violations and enforcement strategies.

Conclusions:

  • Addressing scientific dishonesty requires understanding and modifying incentive structures.
  • Policy interventions should consider sanctions, enforcement, and the internalization of scientific standards.
  • Effective governance is essential to protect the integrity and societal value of scientific research.