Marrow Adipose Tissue Quantification of the Lumbar Spine by Using Dual-Energy CT and Single-Voxel (1)H MR Spectroscopy: A Feasibility Study
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 12, 2026

Segmentation and Linear Measurement for Body Composition Analysis using Slice-O-Matic and Horos
Published on: March 21, 2021
Miriam A Bredella1, Scott M Daley1, Mannudeep K Kalra1
1From the Department of Radiology (M.A.B., S.M.D., M.K.K., M.T.) and Neuroendocrine Unit (K.K.M.), Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, Yawkey 6E, Boston, MA 02114; and Mindways Software, Austin, Tex (J.K.B.).
Purpose:
To test the performance of dual-energy computed tomography (CT) in the assessment of marrow adipose tissue (MAT) content of the lumbar spine by using proton (hydrogen 1 [(1)H]) magnetic resonance (MR) spectroscopy as a reference standard and to determine the influence of MAT on the assessment of bone mineral density (BMD).
Materials And Methods:
This study was institutional review board approved and complied with HIPAA guidelines. Written informed consent was obtained. Twelve obese osteopenic but otherwise healthy subjects (mean age ± standard deviation, 43 years ± 13) underwent 3-T (1)H MR spectroscopy of the L2 vertebra by using a point-resolved spatially localized spectroscopy sequence without water suppression. The L2 vertebra was scanned with dual-energy CT (80 and 140 kV) by using a dual-source multi-detector row CT scanner with a calibration phantom. Mean basis material composition relative to the phantom was estimated in the L2 vertebra. Volumetric BMD was measured with and without correction for MAT. Bland-Altman 95% limits of agreement and Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated.
Results:
There was excellent agreement between (1)H MR spectroscopy and dual-energy CT, with a mean difference in fat fraction of -0.02 between the techniques, with a 95% confidence interval of -0.24, 0.20. There was a strong correlation between marrow fat fraction obtained with (1)H MR spectroscopy and that obtained with dual-energy CT (r = 0.91, P < .001). The presence of MAT led to underestimation of BMD, and this bias increased with increasing MAT content (P < .001).
Conclusion:
Dual-energy CT can be used to assess MAT content and BMD of the lumbar spine in a single examination and provides data that closely agree and correlate with (1)H MR spectroscopy data.
![Quantitative [18F]-Naf-PET-MRI Analysis for the Evaluation of Dynamic Bone Turnover in a Patient with Facetogenic Low Back Pain](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcloudfront.jove.com%2FCDNSource%2Fteasers%2F58491.jpg&w=3840&q=50)
