Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 12, 2026
![Visualization and Quantification of Brown and Beige Adipose Tissues in Mice using [18F]FDG Micro-PET/MR Imaging](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcloudfront.jove.com%2FCDNSource%2Fteasers%2F62460.jpg&w=3840&q=50)
Visualization and Quantification of Brown and Beige Adipose Tissues in Mice using [18F]FDG Micro-PET/MR Imaging
Published on: July 1, 2021
A Digital Reference Object to Analyze Calculation Accuracy of PET Standardized Uptake Value
Larry A Pierce1, Brian F Elston1, David A Clunie1
1From the Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 1715 Columbia Road N, Portage Bay Building, Suite 222, Seattle, WA 98195-7987 (L.A.P., B.F.E., P.E.K.); PixelMed Publishing, Bangor, Pa (D.A.C.); and MiM Software, Cleveland, Ohio (D.N.).
Software variations in calculating standardized uptake value (SUV) by body weight (SUV(BW)) are significant. A Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) reference test object is proposed to standardize SUV computations across workstations.
Area of Science:
- Medical Imaging
- Radiochemistry
- Quantitative Analysis
Background:
- Standardized uptake value (SUV) is crucial for quantitative analysis in PET/CT imaging.
- Variations in SUV computation across different software packages can impact diagnostic accuracy.
- A need exists for standardized methods to ensure consistent SUV measurements.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantify the variability in body weight-normalized SUV (SUV(BW)) calculations across various software packages.
- To introduce a Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) reference test object for standardizing SUV computation.
- To ensure consistency in SUV measurements on medical image viewing workstations.
Main Methods:
- A synthetic positron emission tomographic/computed tomographic (PET/CT) digital reference object (DRO) with known SUV was created.
- The DRO was distributed to 16 sites for evaluation on 21 different PET/CT display software packages.
- Users reported SUV metrics (max, min, mean, SD) from defined regions of interest (ROIs), and deviations from expected values were analyzed.
Main Results:
- Significant errors were observed in reported SUV metrics, with maximum SUV errors ranging from -37.8% to 0% and mean SUV errors from -1.6% to 100%.
- Variability was also noted in minimum SUV and standard deviation SUV calculations.
- The observed discrepancies highlight substantial inconsistencies in SUV(BW) computation.
Conclusions:
- The variability in computed SUV(BW) across different software packages is substantial.
- A reference standard, such as a DICOM test object, is necessary to ensure the standardization of SUV computation.
- Implementing a standardized approach will improve the reliability and comparability of quantitative PET/CT data.
More Related Videos
10:21Continuous Blood Sampling in Small Animal Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Enables the Measurement of the Arterial Input Function
Published on: August 8, 2019
09:55Radiosynthesis, Quality Control, and Small Animal Positron Emission Tomography Imaging of 68Ga-Labelled Nano Molecules
Published on: October 4, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies II: Positron Emission Tomography and Scintigraphy
Fundamental Principles of PET
Positron Emission Tomography
One of the main requirements of a PET scan is a positron-emitting radioisotope, which is produced in a cyclotron and then attached to a substance used by the part of the body...