Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 12, 2026

Nasal Brushing Sampling and Processing Using Digital High Speed Ciliary Videomicroscopy – Adaptation for the COVID-19 Pandemic
Published on: November 7, 2020
Using active methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus surveillance nasal swabs to predict clinical respiratory
Jason Hiett1, Rupal K Patel2, Victoria Tate2
1Jason Hiett, Pharm.D., BCPS, is Clinical Pharmacist, Cincinnati Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC), Cincinnati, OH. Rupal K. Patel, Pharm.D., BCPS, is Clinical Pharmacist, C.W. Bill Young VAMC, Bay Pines, FL; at the time of the study described here, she was Postgraduate Year 1 Pharmacy Resident, Cincinnati VAMC. Victoria Tate, Pharm.D., BCPS, is Clinical Pharmacist; George Smulian, M.D., is Infectious Disease Physician; and Allison Kelly, M.D., is Infectious Disease Physician, Cincinnati VAMC. jason.hiett@va.gov.
Purpose:
Results of a study to determine the utility of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) active surveillance via nasal-swab screening in predicting the results of clinical respiratory cultures are reported.
Methods:
A retrospective chart review-based descriptive analysis was conducted at a Veterans Affairs (VA) medical center. VA databases were used to identify adult patients admitted to the facility over a one-year period who underwent both respiratory culture testing and active MRSA surveillance nasal-swab screening during the hospitalization; only data on patients who had a MRSA surveillance swab within 48 hours before or after respiratory culture testing were included in the analysis. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the MRSA screening method were calculated.
Results:
Data on a total of 297 respiratory cultures and corresponding nasal-swab results were reviewed. The positive predictive value of the nasal-swab method of MRSA surveillance screening was calculated as 37.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 21.1-56.3%); the negative predictive value was 99.3% (95% CI, 97.3-99.9%). MRSA screening by nasal swab had a calculated specificity of 92.9% (95% CI, 89.3-95.6%) and sensitivity of 87.5% (95% CI, 57.2-98.2%). Using Fisher's exact test, it was determined that there was a significant association between swab and culture results (p < 0.001).
Conclusion:
This analysis demonstrated a notable association between negative results of nasal-swab screening for MRSA and an absence of MRSA growth on respiratory clinical cultures at the study site, suggesting that airway swab screening can be a useful tool for streamlining antimicrobial therapy.
Related Concept Videos
Sputum Studies II: Culture and Sensitivity
Sputum culture and sensitivity is a medical procedure used to diagnose bacterial infections in the respiratory tract and select the most appropriate antibiotics for treatment. This process involves analyzing sputum samples of thick and opaque secretions produced in the lungs and airways. These samples are collected from patients and then sent to the laboratory for analysis.
The test can identify various pathogens responsible for respiratory infections, including Streptococcus,...
Sputum Studies I: Gram Stain, cytology, and Acid-fast smear and culture
Gram Stain
The Gram Stain is an integral part of sputum studies. It involves the staining of sputum, which permits...
Physical Assessment of the Respiratory Tract I: Health History
Subjective Data
Subjective data provides vital information about the patient's health history and symptoms. This data is typically collected through interviews in which patients describe their experiences, symptoms, and concerns.
Health history and...
Suctioning the Nasopharyngeal Airway
Equipment Required

