Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same authorSame journal

A Structural Variant in the 5' Regulatory Region of <i>DIAPH3</i> Segregates with Postlingual Hearing Loss and Auditory Neuropathy in a Multigenerational Brazilian Family.

International archives of otorhinolaryngology·2026
Same author

Genetic Landscape of Hearing Loss in Brazilian Patients Reveals Population-Specific Variants and Clinical Correlations.

Clinical genetics·2026
Same author

Is there a difference in the spread of excitation at different electrode locations along the cochlea?

CoDAS·2025
Same author

Bilateral Fitting of Bone-Anchored Hearing Devices: Speech Recognition and Sound Localization.

International archives of otorhinolaryngology·2025
Same author

Effect of Topical Intra-Auricular Lidocaine on Tinnitus: A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study.

International archives of otorhinolaryngology·2025
Same author

Key Performance Indicators Applied in Medicine.

International archives of otorhinolaryngology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 12, 2026

Cochlear Implant Surgery and Electrically-evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Recordings in C57BL/6 Mice
09:06

Cochlear Implant Surgery and Electrically-evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Recordings in C57BL/6 Mice

Published on: January 9, 2019

15.0K

Cochlear implants and bacterial meningitis: A speech recognition study in paired samples.

Rubens de Brito1, Aline Gomes Bittencourt2, Maria Valéria Goffi-Gomez3

  • 1Otolaryngologist, PhD. Associate Professor, Department of Otolaryngology, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil.

International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology
|May 21, 2015
PubMed
Summary

Patients with post-meningitis deafness using cochlear implants for one year showed poorer speech recognition compared to those with hearing loss from other causes, especially on difficult tasks.

Keywords:
Cochlear implantsMeningitisSpeech perception

More Related Videos

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
06:04

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages

Published on: March 24, 2023

947
Author Spotlight: Advancements in Impedance Monitoring for Cochlear Implant Surgery
06:54

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Impedance Monitoring for Cochlear Implant Surgery

Published on: August 4, 2023

2.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 12, 2026

Cochlear Implant Surgery and Electrically-evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Recordings in C57BL/6 Mice
09:06

Cochlear Implant Surgery and Electrically-evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Recordings in C57BL/6 Mice

Published on: January 9, 2019

15.0K
Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
06:04

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages

Published on: March 24, 2023

947
Author Spotlight: Advancements in Impedance Monitoring for Cochlear Implant Surgery
06:54

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Impedance Monitoring for Cochlear Implant Surgery

Published on: August 4, 2023

2.0K

Area of Science:

  • Audiology
  • Neurosurgery
  • Otolaryngology

Background:

  • Cochlear implants offer significant hearing restoration but individual outcomes vary.
  • Speech recognition performance differs among cochlear implant users.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare speech recognition in post-lingual cochlear implant users with deafness secondary to bacterial meningitis versus other causes.
  • To determine if meningitis-related hearing loss impacts cochlear implant outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective study of post-lingual patients with Nucleus-22 or Nucleus-24 cochlear implants (≥1 year use).
  • Patients were matched for age, duration of deafness, and implant use.
  • Speech perception assessed using the Latin-American Protocol for the Evaluation of Cochlear Implants (Portuguese version).

Main Results:

  • 52 patients (26 per group) were analyzed; no significant difference in active electrodes between post-meningitic and other groups.
  • Significant variability in speech recognition was observed between groups.
  • Poorer performance in the post-meningitic group was noted on challenging tasks like medial consonant identification.

Conclusions:

  • Cochlear implant recipients with hearing loss due to bacterial meningitis performed worse on speech recognition tests after one year of use.
  • Meningitis as a cause of deafness may present unique challenges for cochlear implant rehabilitation.
  • Further research is needed to understand and mitigate these performance differences.