Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 12, 2026

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
Published on: May 15, 2020
Prescription errors before and after introduction of electronic medication alert system in a pediatric emergency
Usha Sethuraman1, Nirupama Kannikeswaran1, Kyle P Murray2
1Department of Pediatrics, Wayne State University, Carman and Ann Adams Department of Pediatrics, Division of Emergency Medicine, Children's Hospital of Michigan, Detroit, MI.
Insights
Computerized physician order entry (CPOE) with an electronic medication alert system (EMAS) significantly reduced prescription errors in a pediatric emergency department. Further system improvements are needed to decrease false-positive alerts.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Emergency Medicine
- Health Informatics
- Patient Safety
Background:
- Prescription errors are common in pediatric emergency departments (PEDs).
- The impact of computerized physician order entry (CPOE) with electronic medication alert systems (EMAS) on these errors is not well understood.
- This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of CPOE with EMAS in reducing prescription errors.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare prescription error rates before and after the implementation of CPOE with EMAS in a PED.
- To determine if CPOE with EMAS reduces the rate and severity of prescription errors.
- To analyze alert types, significance, and prescriber responses to alerts.
Main Methods:
- A prospective study comparing medication prescriptions 5 months before and after CPOE with EMAS implementation.
- Analysis of 7,268 prescriptions before and 7,292 prescriptions after implementation.
- Medication errors were classified as significant if they had the potential for life-threatening injury, therapy failure, or adverse drug effects.
Main Results:
- Overall prescription errors decreased from 10.4 to 7.3 per 100 prescriptions (absolute risk reduction = 3.1%).
- Drug dosing error rates dropped from 8 to 5.4 per 100 prescriptions (absolute risk reduction = 2.6%).
- CPOE with EMAS had a sensitivity of 45.1% and specificity of 57% in identifying prescription errors, with 20% of dosing alerts leading to prescriber modifications and 11% of true alerts being overridden.
Conclusions:
- CPOE with EMAS implementation was associated with a significant reduction in overall prescription errors in the pediatric emergency department.
- Despite the reduction in errors, further refinements to the CPOE with EMAS are necessary to address high false-positive alert rates.
Objectives:
Prescription errors occur frequently in pediatric emergency departments (PEDs).The effect of computerized physician order entry (CPOE) with electronic medication alert system (EMAS) on these is unknown. The objective was to compare prescription errors rates before and after introduction of CPOE with EMAS in a PED. The hypothesis was that CPOE with EMAS would significantly reduce the rate and severity of prescription errors in the PED.
Methods:
A prospective comparison of a sample of outpatient, medication prescriptions 5 months before and after CPOE with EMAS implementation (7,268 before and 7,292 after) was performed. Error types and rates, alert types and significance, and physician response were noted. Medication errors were deemed significant if there was a potential to cause life-threatening injury, failure of therapy, or an adverse drug effect.
Results:
There was a significant reduction in the errors per 100 prescriptions (10.4 before vs. 7.3 after; absolute risk reduction = 3.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.2 to 4.0). Drug dosing error rates decreased from 8 to 5.4 per 100 (absolute risk reduction = 2.6, 95% CI = 1.8 to 3.4). Alerts were generated for 29.6% of prescriptions, with 45% involving drug dose range checking. The sensitivity of CPOE with EMAS in identifying errors in prescriptions was 45.1% (95% CI = 40.8% to 49.6%), and the specificity was 57% (95% CI = 55.6% to 58.5%). Prescribers modified 20% of the dosing alerts, resulting in the error not reaching the patient. Conversely, 11% of true dosing alerts for medication errors were overridden by the prescribers: 88 (11.3%) resulted in medication errors, and 684 (88.6%) were false-positive alerts.
Conclusions:
A CPOE with EMAS was associated with a decrease in overall prescription errors in our PED. Further system refinements are required to reduce the high false-positive alert rates.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Pharmaceutical Poisoning: Potential Scenarios
Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
Guidelines and Strategies for Safe Computer Charting
Maintain Confidentiality and Security:
Methods of Documentation VII: EMR
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion

