Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 12, 2026

In Vitro Application of a Wireless Sensor in Flexion-Extension Gap Balance of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty
07:33

In Vitro Application of a Wireless Sensor in Flexion-Extension Gap Balance of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

Published on: May 5, 2023

1.3K

Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: Does a Selection Bias Exist?

Robert E Howell1, Adolph V Lombardi2, Ryan Crilly1

  • 1Joint Implant Surgeons, Inc., New Albany, OH.

The Journal of Arthroplasty
|May 24, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Contemporary bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty implants demonstrate favorable survivorship: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 1576 knees.

European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie·2026
Same author

A Systematic Review of Registry and Large Database Studies Comparing Contemporary Cementless and Cemented Total Knee Arthroplasty.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2026
Same author

Factor XI and XIa Inhibitors for Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Review From Mechanism to Phase III Trials.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2026
Same author

A Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare a Mobile Bearing Cementless and Cemented Unicompartmental Knee: Results of an Investigational Device Exemption Study in the United States.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2026
Same author

Navigating the Ambulatory Surgery Center Setting: How to Go From Operating to Thriving.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2026
Same author

Cementless Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review of Survivorship and Revision Indications.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2026

Selection bias in knee replacement surgery exists. Patients converted from unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) intraoperatively showed similar outcomes to UKA patients and better results than planned TKA patients.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Clinical Outcomes Research

Background:

  • Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a minimally invasive procedure offering potential benefits like faster recovery.
  • The actual clinical outcomes of UKA versus total knee arthroplasty (TKA) may be influenced by patient selection bias.
  • Previous investigations have not fully explored the impact of selection bias on UKA outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the presence and impact of selection bias in candidates for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.
  • To compare the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing UKA, those converted to TKA intraoperatively, and those initially planned for TKA.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective cohort study design.
  • Comparison of three groups: planned UKA receiving UKA, planned UKA converted to TKA, and planned TKA receiving TKA.
Keywords:
indicationspatient selectionselection biastotal knee arthroplastyunicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 12, 2026

In Vitro Application of a Wireless Sensor in Flexion-Extension Gap Balance of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty
07:33

In Vitro Application of a Wireless Sensor in Flexion-Extension Gap Balance of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

Published on: May 5, 2023

1.3K
  • Analysis of clinical outcomes, including patient recovery and overall results.

    • Main Results:

    • A significant selection bias in the choice of UKA candidates was identified.
    • Patients converted to TKA intraoperatively demonstrated clinical results comparable to those who received UKA.
    • The converted TKA group achieved superior clinical outcomes compared to patients originally scheduled for TKA.

    Conclusions:

    • Selection bias is a factor in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty candidate selection.
    • Intraoperative conversion to TKA does not necessarily lead to poorer outcomes compared to UKA.
    • Patients converted to TKA intraoperatively may experience better outcomes than those initially planned for TKA, suggesting a potential benefit or a complex interplay of factors.