Coronary artery bypass surgery without cardioplegia: hospital results in 8515 patients†

Pedro E Antunes1, J Ferrão de Oliveira1, David Prieto1

  • 1Centre of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.

Insights

Non-cardioplegic methods for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) are safe and effective. This study found low mortality and morbidity rates in a large patient series, highlighting their utility.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Surgery
  • Cardiac Anesthesia
  • Thoracic Surgery

Background:

  • Cardioplegic myocardial protection is standard in cardiac surgery.
  • Alternative methods for myocardial protection are being explored.
  • Non-cardioplegic techniques offer potential benefits in specific procedures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze perioperative outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) without cardioplegia.
  • To evaluate the safety and efficacy of non-cardioplegic myocardial preservation methods.
  • To identify risk factors for mortality and major morbidity in this patient cohort.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 8515 patients undergoing isolated CABG with CPB without cardioplegia (1992-2013).
  • Procedures utilized hypothermic ventricular fibrillation and/or an empty beating heart.
  • Multivariate analysis assessed risk factors for in-hospital mortality and major morbidity (stroke, mediastinitis, acute kidney injury).

Main Results:

  • Low in-hospital mortality (0.7%) and major morbidity rates.
  • Incidence of stroke/TIA was 2.6%, acute myocardial infarction (AMI) was 2.5%, and acute kidney injury (AKI) was 18.9%.
  • Independent risk factors for adverse outcomes included older age, left ventricular dysfunction, and longer CPB time.

Conclusions:

  • Isolated CABG with CPB using non-cardioplegic methods is a safe and effective myocardial preservation strategy.
  • These techniques are simple, expeditious, and represent valuable alternatives.
  • Low perioperative complication rates support their continued use.
Abstract