Test-retest reliability of dynamic causal modeling for fMRI
Stefan Frässle1, Klaas Enno Stephan2, Karl John Friston3
1Section of Brainimaging, Department of Psychiatry, University of Marburg, 35039 Marburg, Germany; Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University of Marburg, 35039 Marburg, Germany.
Software version impacts Dynamic Causal Modeling (DCM) reliability for fMRI effective connectivity. Classical DCM (cDCM) showed high test-retest reliability, while a newer version (DCM10) showed reduced reliability, which was restored by using cDCM priors.
Area of Science:
- Neuroimaging analysis
- Computational neuroscience
- Brain connectivity research
Background:
- Dynamic Causal Modeling (DCM) is a Bayesian framework for inferring effective connectivity from neuroimaging data.
- Previous studies have investigated DCM's validity, but systematic examination of its parameter estimate reliability across sessions is less common.
- Assessing test-retest reliability is crucial for the clinical and research applications of DCM in functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI).
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically compare the test-retest reliability of different Dynamic Causal Modeling (DCM) implementations for fMRI data.
- To investigate the influence of software versions and prior distributions on the reliability of DCM parameter estimates.
- To evaluate the reliability of DCM in a challenging scenario with complex models and limited data points.
Main Methods:
- Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) data were acquired from 35 subjects performing a motor task across two sessions, one month apart.
- Dynamic Causal Modeling (DCM) was applied to motor regions using classical DCM (cDCM) in SPM5 and a newer version (DCM10) in SPM8.
- Test-retest reliability was quantified using the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) for model evidence and parameter estimates.
Main Results:
- Classical DCM (cDCM) in SPM5 demonstrated high test-retest reliability for model evidence (ICC=0.94) and parameter estimates (median ICC=0.47).
- The newer DCM10 version in SPM8 showed notably reduced test-retest reliability.
- Using cDCM priors within DCM10 restored and even improved reliability compared to cDCM, suggesting the crucial role of prior distributions and regularization.
Conclusions:
- The reliability of Dynamic Causal Modeling (DCM) for fMRI effective connectivity is sensitive to software versions and prior distributions.
- Tighter regularization from cDCM priors appears to enhance reliability by reducing the likelihood of local extrema in the objective function.
- Future developments focusing on global optimization and empirical Bayesian procedures are needed to overcome software-dependency and improve DCM reliability.
More Related Videos
05:55Modeling the Functional Network for Spatial Navigation in the Human Brain
Published on: October 13, 2023
09:01A Method for Investigating Age-related Differences in the Functional Connectivity of Cognitive Control Networks Associated with Dimensional Change Card Sort Performance
Published on: May 7, 2014
