In vitro bactericidal activity of cefepime and cefpirome against clinical isolates at Karachi

Adeel Arsalan1, Syed Baqar Shayam Naqvi2, Syed Abid Ali3

  • 1Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Baqai Medical University, Toll Plaza, Super Highway, Gadap Road, Karachi, Pakistan.

Insights

Antibiotic resistance is rising due to misuse. This study compared cefepime and cefpirome against common bacteria, finding varying effectiveness and resistance levels for each drug.

Area of Science:

  • Microbiology
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • Antibiotic resistance poses a significant global health threat, increasing morbidity and mortality.
  • Regulatory bodies like the FDA, CDC, and WHO emphasize the need for antibiotic resistance surveillance.
  • The irrational use of antibiotics has led to augmented microbial resistance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the in vitro antibacterial activity of cefepime and cefpirome against common clinical isolates.
  • To determine the resistance patterns of Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Proteus species, and Klebsiella pneumoniae to these fourth-generation cephalosporins.

Main Methods:

  • A Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method was employed.
  • 141 clinical isolates including Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Proteus species, and Klebsiella pneumoniae were tested.
  • Antibacterial activity and resistance percentages against cefepime and cefpirome were assessed.

Main Results:

  • Cefpirome demonstrated superior bactericidal activity against Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae compared to cefepime.
  • Cefepime showed better antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus and Proteus species.
  • Resistance percentages varied: against cefepime, resistance was observed in 37.7% of S. aureus, 26.3% of E. coli, 11.3% of Proteus, and 34.8% of K. pneumoniae. Against cefpirome, resistance was 41.4% for S. aureus, 21.7% for E. coli, 8.9% for Proteus, and 17.6% for K. pneumoniae.

Conclusions:

  • Both cefepime and cefpirome exhibit distinct antibacterial profiles against key clinical pathogens.
  • Understanding differential efficacy and resistance patterns is crucial for optimizing antibiotic use in treating various infections.
  • Surveillance of antibiotic resistance is vital for informed clinical decision-making and combating antimicrobial resistance.