Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

12.6K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
12.6K
Uncertainty: Overview00:59

Uncertainty: Overview

1.9K
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
1.9K
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals01:19

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

10.6K
A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
10.6K
Confidence Intervals01:21

Confidence Intervals

11.3K
An unbiased point estimate is often insufficient to predict a population estimate, such as population mean or population proportion. In this scenario, a confidence interval is used. A confidence interval is an estimate similar to a  sample proportion. However, unlike the point estimate which is a single value, the confidence interval  contains a range of values. These values have lower and upper limits, known as confidence limits, and can be designated as L1 and L2, respectively.
A...
11.3K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

113.8K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
113.8K
Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean01:25

Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean

9.4K
A point estimate of the population mean is obtained from a single sample. Such a point estimate does not represent a population well because it needs to account for variability in the population. Single point estimate can also be biased despite the sample being selected randomly. Thus, a point estimate is often unreliable. A confidence interval is needed to reduce this unreliability.
A confidence interval for the mean is a range of values that provides an estimate of the population mean. As the...
9.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A simple morphometric algorithm based on nuclear atypia features of invasive breast carcinoma: relationship with nuclear grade, Ki-67 level, and hormone receptor status.

Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)·2026
Same author

Plasma Biomarkers Associated with Clinical Outcomes of FOLFIRI Plus Ramucirumab in RAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The JACCRO CC-16AR Trial.

Targeted oncology·2026
Same author

Establishment of a Model to Predict the Prognosis of Endometrial Carcinoma Using Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes Evaluated With Artificial Intelligence: A Retrospective Analysis.

Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.)·2026
Same author

Comparison of breast ultrasound image classification accuracy between convolutional neural networks and human experts using multicenter external validation cohort data.

Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001)·2026
Same author

AI-driven spatial mapping of myxoid stroma and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society·2025
Same author

Estimating Phase From Observed Trajectories Using the Temporal 1-Form.

Neural computation·2025
Same journal

Registration of 2D Images from Fast Scanning Ophthalmic Instruments.

Biomedical image registration, ... proceedings. WBIR (Workshop : 2006- )·2026
Same journal

Registration by Regression (RbR): a framework for interpretable and flexible atlas registration.

Biomedical image registration, ... proceedings. WBIR (Workshop : 2006- )·2025
Same journal

SuperWarp: Supervised Learning and Warping on U-Net for Invariant Subvoxel-Precise Registration.

Biomedical image registration, ... proceedings. WBIR (Workshop : 2006- )·2022
Same journal

Validation of DRAMMS among 12 Popular Methods in Cross-Subject Cardiac MRI Registration.

Biomedical image registration, ... proceedings. WBIR (Workshop : 2006- )·2017
Same journal

A Method for Automated Cortical Surface Registration and Labeling.

Biomedical image registration, ... proceedings. WBIR (Workshop : 2006- )·2015
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 12, 2026

Author Spotlight: An Efficient and Robust Software for Automated Fusion of Multiple Preclinical Imaging Modalities
07:13

Author Spotlight: An Efficient and Robust Software for Automated Fusion of Multiple Preclinical Imaging Modalities

Published on: October 27, 2023

1.8K

Spatial Confidence Regions for Quantifying and Visualizing Registration Uncertainty.

Takanori Watanabe, Clayton Scott

    Biomedical Image Registration, ... Proceedings. WBIR (Workshop : 2006- )
    |May 26, 2015
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Quantifying image registration uncertainty is crucial for clinical use. This study introduces a novel data-driven method to visualize and measure this uncertainty using adaptive confidence regions, improving diagnostic accuracy.

    More Related Videos

    Four-Dimensional CT Analysis Using Sequential 3D-3D Registration
    05:05

    Four-Dimensional CT Analysis Using Sequential 3D-3D Registration

    Published on: November 23, 2019

    8.6K
    Quantitative Assessment Protocol for Facial Soft Tissue Volumetric Changes with Stereophotogrammetry
    06:26

    Quantitative Assessment Protocol for Facial Soft Tissue Volumetric Changes with Stereophotogrammetry

    Published on: December 9, 2025

    311

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Apr 12, 2026

    Author Spotlight: An Efficient and Robust Software for Automated Fusion of Multiple Preclinical Imaging Modalities
    07:13

    Author Spotlight: An Efficient and Robust Software for Automated Fusion of Multiple Preclinical Imaging Modalities

    Published on: October 27, 2023

    1.8K
    Four-Dimensional CT Analysis Using Sequential 3D-3D Registration
    05:05

    Four-Dimensional CT Analysis Using Sequential 3D-3D Registration

    Published on: November 23, 2019

    8.6K
    Quantitative Assessment Protocol for Facial Soft Tissue Volumetric Changes with Stereophotogrammetry
    06:26

    Quantitative Assessment Protocol for Facial Soft Tissue Volumetric Changes with Stereophotogrammetry

    Published on: December 9, 2025

    311

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Imaging
    • Computational Anatomy
    • Image Analysis

    Background:

    • Clinical application of image registration requires reliable uncertainty estimation.
    • Current methods lack robust quantification of point-correspondence uncertainty.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To develop a data-driven method for visualizing and quantifying image registration uncertainty.
    • To provide spatially adaptive confidence regions for registration results.

    Main Methods:

    • Utilized a B-spline deformation model and negative sum of squared differences.
    • Introduced a novel shrinkage-based estimate for the distribution of deformation parameters.
    • Applied the method to 2-D lung and liver images.

    Main Results:

    • Demonstrated the ability to visualize and quantify registration uncertainty.
    • The proposed method is adaptable to various deformation models and similarity criteria.
    • Empirical evaluations in 2-D show the method's effectiveness and generalizability to 3-D.

    Conclusions:

    • The developed method enhances the clinical applicability of image registration by providing uncertainty measures.
    • Spatially adaptive confidence regions offer valuable insights into registration reliability.
    • This approach contributes to more trustworthy medical image analysis.