Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Causes of Social Behavior II: Cognitive Processes01:15

Causes of Social Behavior II: Cognitive Processes

280
Cognitive processes affect social behavior by guiding how individuals perceive, interpret, and respond to social stimuli. These mental processes enable individuals to assess others' behaviors, attribute causes to their actions, and form expectations based on past experiences.Causes of Behavior and Social JudgmentsIndividuals determine the causes of others' behaviors by distinguishing between personal traits and external circumstances. For example, if a friend frequently arrives late, an...
280
Behavioral Genetics and Its Designs01:23

Behavioral Genetics and Its Designs

1.4K
Behavior genetics explores how genetic inheritance influences human behavior. It focuses on how genes, passed from parents to offspring, contribute to the development of behavioral traits and tendencies. This branch of genetics seeks to understand the complex interplay between inherited genetic factors and environmental influences in shaping our behaviors.
The primary methodologies used in behavior genetics include family studies, twin studies, and adoption studies, each providing unique...
1.4K
Pharmacodynamic Models: Direct Effect Model and Indirect Response Model01:29

Pharmacodynamic Models: Direct Effect Model and Indirect Response Model

124
Pharmacodynamic models are essential tools in understanding the relationship between drug concentrations and their effects on biological systems. By characterizing the dynamics of drug action, these models guide dose selection, optimize therapeutic efficacy, and inform the development of new drugs. Two major classes of pharmacodynamic models include direct effect and indirect response models.Direct Effect ModelsDirect effect models describe the immediate relationship between drug concentration...
124
Mechanistic Models: Overview of Compartment Models01:21

Mechanistic Models: Overview of Compartment Models

540
Mechanistic models, a category encompassing both physiological and compartmental modeling, differ from empirical models' approaches to incorporating known factors about the systems being modeled. Empirical models describe data with minimal assumptions, while mechanistic models aim to provide a robust description of available data by specifying assumptions and integrating known factors about the system. Compartmental analysis is a key example of a mechanistic model in pharmacokinetics and...
540
Pharmacodynamic Models: Overview01:27

Pharmacodynamic Models: Overview

123
Pharmacodynamic (PD) responses describe the interaction between a drug and its biological target, culminating in a physiological effect. These responses can be classified into different types: continuous variables, such as blood glucose levels; categorical outcomes, like survival rates; and time-to-event metrics, such as disease progression. Understanding and modeling PD responses are critical for optimizing drug efficacy and safety.PD models describe the relationship between drug concentration...
123
Introduction to Biological Bases of Psychology01:30

Introduction to Biological Bases of Psychology

6.1K
Biopsychology serves as a vital bridge connecting the intricate domains of biology and psychology, shedding light on how biological systems influence psychological phenomena. This field scrutinizes the biological substrates of behavior and mental processes, emphasizing the nervous system along with the roles of neurotransmitters, hormones, and genetics. It also incorporates evolutionary perspectives to explain the adaptive nature of mental functions.
The nervous system, the cornerstone of...
6.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

An Overcomplete Approach to Fitting Drift-Diffusion Decision Models to Trial-By-Trial Data.

Frontiers in artificial intelligence·2021
Same author

Computational neuroimaging strategies for single patient predictions.

NeuroImage·2016
Same author

Confidence and psychosis: a neuro-computational account of contingency learning disruption by NMDA blockade.

Molecular psychiatry·2015
Same author

Bayesian model selection for group studies - revisited.

NeuroImage·2013
Same author

An electrophysiological validation of stochastic DCM for fMRI.

Frontiers in computational neuroscience·2013
Same author

Stochastic dynamic causal modelling of fMRI data: should we care about neural noise?

NeuroImage·2012

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 12, 2026

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Investigating Causal Brain-behavioral Relationships and their Time Course
11:33

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Investigating Causal Brain-behavioral Relationships and their Time Course

Published on: July 18, 2014

44.3K

Dynamic causal modelling of brain-behaviour relationships.

L Rigoux1, J Daunizeau2

  • 1Brain and Spine Institute, Paris, France.

Neuroimage
|May 27, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

We introduce behavioural Dynamic Causal Modelling (bDCM), a new method to understand how brain activity transforms stimuli into behaviour. This approach models neural networks to predict behavioural outcomes and analyze brain function after lesions.

Keywords:
Brain connectivityBrain lesionDCMDecodingDeficitEncodingFunctional degeneracyFunctional recoveryMediation analysisfMRI

More Related Videos

Comprehensive Analysis of Transcription Dynamics from Brain Samples Following Behavioral Experience
08:14

Comprehensive Analysis of Transcription Dynamics from Brain Samples Following Behavioral Experience

Published on: August 26, 2014

12.2K
Dynamic Inter-subject Functional Connectivity Reveals Moment-to-Moment Brain Network Configurations Driven by Continuous or Communication Paradigms
08:36

Dynamic Inter-subject Functional Connectivity Reveals Moment-to-Moment Brain Network Configurations Driven by Continuous or Communication Paradigms

Published on: March 21, 2019

7.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 12, 2026

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Investigating Causal Brain-behavioral Relationships and their Time Course
11:33

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Investigating Causal Brain-behavioral Relationships and their Time Course

Published on: July 18, 2014

44.3K
Comprehensive Analysis of Transcription Dynamics from Brain Samples Following Behavioral Experience
08:14

Comprehensive Analysis of Transcription Dynamics from Brain Samples Following Behavioral Experience

Published on: August 26, 2014

12.2K
Dynamic Inter-subject Functional Connectivity Reveals Moment-to-Moment Brain Network Configurations Driven by Continuous or Communication Paradigms
08:36

Dynamic Inter-subject Functional Connectivity Reveals Moment-to-Moment Brain Network Configurations Driven by Continuous or Communication Paradigms

Published on: March 21, 2019

7.8K

Area of Science:

  • Computational neuroscience
  • Cognitive neuroscience
  • Mathematical modeling

Background:

  • Understanding brain-behaviour relationships is crucial for neuroscience.
  • Existing models often lack a direct link between neural dynamics and observable behaviour.
  • Bridging the gap between neuroimaging and neuropsychology requires robust analytical frameworks.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a novel mathematical framework, behavioural Dynamic Causal Modelling (bDCM), for analyzing brain-behaviour relationships.
  • To decompose the brain's transformation of stimuli into behavioural outcomes by modeling neural network dynamics.
  • To enable predictions of behavioural deficits following simulated lesions and assess functional recovery.

Main Methods:

  • Developed behavioural Dynamic Causal Modelling (bDCM) to link neural activity to behavioural outputs.
  • Used neuroimaging data (fMRI) to constrain and validate the model's neural parameters.
  • Employed artificial lesion analyses to predict behavioural deficits and quantify network importance.
  • Validated the approach using Monte-Carlo simulations and empirical data from an inhibitory control task.

Main Results:

  • Demonstrated the face validity of bDCM through simulations.
  • Showcased the predictive validity of bDCM using real fMRI and behavioural data.
  • Confirmed bDCM's ability to approximate the brain's input-output transform with neurobiological constraints.

Conclusions:

  • bDCM provides a powerful tool for understanding brain-behaviour dynamics.
  • The method facilitates the study of functional degeneracy in healthy brains.
  • bDCM holds promise for predicting functional recovery in neurological patients post-lesion.