Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Temporal-gap detection by cochlear prosthesis users.

J P Preece1, R S Tyler

  • 1Department of Speech Pathology, University of Iowa, Iowa City.

Journal of Speech and Hearing Research
|December 1, 1989
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Recent Advances in Tinnitus.

American journal of audiology·2015
Same author

Cochlear Implants and the Deaf Culture.

American journal of audiology·2015
Same author

Response to Pool and Rose.

American journal of audiology·2015
Same author

Pre-lingually deaf children can perform as well as post-lingually deaf adults using cochlear implants.

Cochlear implants international·2008
Same author

A preliminary investigation comparing one and eight channels at fast and slow rates on music appraisal in adults with cochlear implants.

Cochlear implants international·2008
Same author

7-year speech perception results and the effects of age, residual hearing and preimplant speech perception in prelingually deaf children using the Nucleus and Clarion cochlear implants.

Advances in oto-rhino-laryngology·2002
Same journal

Temporal resolution in infancy and subsequent language development.

Journal of speech and hearing research·1996
Same journal

Evidence of sensitivity to structural contrasts in the literature on children's language comprehension.

Journal of speech and hearing research·1996
Same journal

Narrative development in late talkers: early school age.

Journal of speech and hearing research·1996
Same journal

A system for the diagnosis of specific language impairment in kindergarten children.

Journal of speech and hearing research·1996
Same journal

Interactive focused stimulation for toddlers with expressive vocabulary delays.

Journal of speech and hearing research·1996
Same journal

Auditory lexical decisions of children with specific language impairment.

Journal of speech and hearing research·1996
See all related articles

Cochlear implant users

Area of Science:

  • Auditory Neuroscience
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Speech and Hearing Sciences

Background:

  • Cochlear implants (CIs) are vital for hearing restoration in severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss.
  • Understanding the perceptual limits of CI users is crucial for optimizing device performance and rehabilitation.
  • Temporal gap detection, the ability to perceive brief silent intervals, is a key aspect of auditory processing affected by CI use.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the minimum-detectable temporal gaps for users of multi-electrode cochlear prostheses.
  • To determine how stimulus level, frequency, and electrode location influence gap detection thresholds.
  • To compare the effects of sensation level and perceived loudness on gap detection performance.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Measured minimum-detectable temporal gaps in three cochlear implant users.
  • Varied stimulus parameters: sensation level (SL), loudness (using direct magnitude estimation), frequency, and electrode place.
  • Analyzed gap detection thresholds as a function of these parameters.

    • Main Results:

    • Minimum-detectable gaps decreased with increasing sensation level and loudness, eventually plateauing.
    • At equal sensation levels, gap detection improved (smaller gaps detected) with higher frequencies.
    • The frequency effect was less pronounced when data were normalized for perceived loudness.
    • More basal electrode placements yielded better gap detection at lower stimulus levels, but this effect diminished at higher levels.

    Conclusions:

    • Temporal gap detection in cochlear implant users is influenced by stimulus intensity, frequency, and electrode location.
    • Loudness perception plays a significant role in modulating frequency-dependent gap detection.
    • Electrode place effects are more prominent at lower stimulus levels, suggesting complex interactions between stimulation site and intensity coding.