Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance: Are We Utilizing It?

Nowlan Selvapatt1, Henry House, Ashley Brown

  • 1*Imperial College †Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.

Insights

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) screening surveillance in UK cirrhosis patients is suboptimal, with only 65% receiving recommended 6-monthly ultrasounds. Early detection outcomes did not significantly differ between surveillance and incidental findings.

Area of Science:

  • Hepatology
  • Oncology
  • Medical Imaging

Background:

  • International guidelines advocate 6-monthly ultrasound surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in cirrhosis patients.
  • This study examines HCC screening adherence and outcomes in the UK's largest reported cirrhosis cohort.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of HCC surveillance in a large UK cirrhosis cohort.
  • To identify predictors of surveillance adherence and analyze detection outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of cirrhotic patients eligible for HCC screening (n=898) at three London teaching hospitals.
  • Categorization of patients into 'routine' or 'overdue' for surveillance, with analysis of non-adherence reasons.
  • Univariate and multivariate analyses to identify clinical and sociodemographic surveillance predictors.

Main Results:

  • Only 65% of eligible patients received HCC surveillance within the recommended 6-month period.
  • Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was detected in 6.8% of the cohort (61 cases).
  • HCCs diagnosed via surveillance showed no significantly superior outcomes compared to incidentally detected cases.

Conclusions:

  • HCC surveillance in this UK cirrhosis cohort is suboptimal and likely reflects broader national practice.
  • Current surveillance strategies may not be improving patient outcomes significantly.
  • Further research is needed to optimize HCC screening protocols for improved early detection and patient prognosis.
Abstract