Related Experiment Videos

Intussusception: clinical and radiographic factors influencing reducibility

C A Stephenson1, J J Seibert, J D Strain

  • 1Department of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock.

Pediatric Radiology
|January 1, 1989
PubMed

Insights

Hydrostatic reduction of intussusception using barium or air enema is effective. Distal intussusception and prolonged symptoms reduce success, but complications remain low, even for rectal cases.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Surgery
  • Gastroenterology
  • Radiology

Background:

  • Hydrostatic reduction is a standard treatment for intussusception.
  • Evaluating factors influencing reduction success and complications is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review a five-year experience with hydrostatic reduction of intussusception.
  • To compare results with previous studies and evaluate clinical/radiographic factors.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of 5-year experience at two children's hospitals.
  • Analysis of clinical and radiographic factors impacting reduction rates.
  • Comparison of complication rates with prior research.

Main Results:

  • Reduction rates decrease with more distal intussusception.
  • 25% of rectal intussusceptions reduced without increased complications.
  • Small bowel obstruction and prolonged symptoms significantly decreased reduction rates.
  • Crescent sign and patient age were not significant factors.

Conclusions:

  • Hydrostatic reduction remains a viable treatment for intussusception.
  • While distal location and symptom duration impact success, complications are not significantly increased.
  • Further investigation into predictive factors for successful reduction is warranted.

Related Concept Videos