Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 11, 2026

The Use of an Automated System GreenFeed to Monitor Enteric Methane and Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Ruminant Animals
Published on: September 7, 2015
Methane production and methanogen levels in steers that differ in residual gain
Abstract:
Methane (CH4) gas released by cattle isa product of fermentation in the digestive tract. The 2 primary sites of CH4 production in ruminants are the reticulum-rumen complex and the cecum. Methane release from cattle represents a 2% to 12% loss of the energy intake. Reducing the proportion of feed energy lost as CH4 has the potential of improving feed efficiency as well as decreasing the contribution of cattle to greenhouse gas production. Feed intake and growth were measured on 132 fall-born steers for 70 d. Seven steers with extreme positive residual gain (RG) and 7 steers with extreme negative RG whose DMI was within 0.32 SD of the mean intake were selected for subsequent measurements. Enteric CH4 production was measured via indirect calorimetry. Rumen, cecum, and rectal contents were obtained from steers at slaughter for measurement of in vitro CH4 production and methanogen 16S rRNA levels. Enteric CH4 production did not differ (P = 0.11) between the positive RG (112 ± 13 L/d)and the negative RG (74 ± 13 L/d) steers. In vitro rumen methane production did not differ between positive RG(64.26 × 10(-5) ± 10.85 × 10(-5) mmol∙g(-1) DM∙min(-1)) and negative RG (61.49 × 10(-5) ± 10.85 × 10(-5) mmol∙g(-1)DM∙min(-1); P = 0.86). In vitro cecum methane production did not differ between positive RG (4.24 ×10(-5) ± 1.90 × 10(-5) mmol∙g(-1) DM∙min(-1)) and negative RG (4.35 × 10(-5) ± 1.90 × 10(-5) mmol∙g(-1) DM∙min(-1); P = 0.97). Methanogen 16S rRNA as a percentage of the total bacteria16S rRNA did not differ between RG groups (P = 0.18). The methanogen 16S rRNA as a percentage of rumen fluid total bacteria 16S rRNA (5.3% ±3.1%) did not differ from the methanogen 16S rRNA asa percentage of cecum content total bacteria 16S rRNA(11.8% ± 3.1%; P = 0.14). The methanogen 16S rRNA as a percentage of the rectum content total bacteria 16SrRNA (0.7% ± 3.1%) was not different from the rumen content (P = 0.29) but was less than the cecum content(P = 0.01). Methanomicrobiales 16S rRNA as a percentage of total methanogen 16S rRNA did not differ across sample sites (P = 0.81); however, steers with positive RG (10.5% ± 1.6%) were more numerous than steers with negative RG (5.1% ± 1.6%; P = 0.02). Cattle that differ in RG at the same DMI do not differ in characteristics associated with CH4 production.
More Related Videos
06:11Author Spotlight: Advancing Anaerobic Microbiota Research Using a Novel Respirometry Protocol
Published on: April 26, 2024
08:29Measuring Liver Mitochondrial Oxygen Consumption and Proton Leak Kinetics to Estimate Mitochondrial Respiration in Holstein Dairy Cattle
Published on: November 30, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Microbes and Methanogenesis
Microbial Interactions: Mutualism
Microbes and Climate Change
Overview of Archaea