Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 11, 2026
Predicting Amputation using Local Circulating Mononuclear Progenitor Cells in Angioplasty-treated Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia
Published on: September 22, 2020
Endogenous pro-thrombotic biomarkers from the arm and leg may not have the same value
Christopher R Lattimer1, Evi Kalodiki2, George Geroulakos3
1Josef Pflug Vascular Laboratory, Ealing Hospital, Southall, UK Imperial College, London, UK Department of Vascular Surgery, Northwick Park Hospital, Harrow, UK c.lattimer09@imperial.ac.uk.
Objective:
Assessments of endogenous pro-thrombotic biomarkers are performed invariably on arm blood. However, the commonest site for thrombosis is in the leg. A leg blood sample may reflect local pro-thrombotic processes more accurately than systemic arm blood. The aim was to determine whether pro-thrombotic biomarkers from standard venous arm samples differed significantly from leg samples.
Method:
Concurrent blood samples were taken from an ankle/lower calf varicose vein and an ante-cubital vein in 24 patients awaiting laser treatment as well as age approximated and sex matched healthy controls without venous disease. The following assays were performed: thrombin-antithrombin (ng/ml), antithrombin (%) activity, microparticles (nM), fibrinogen (mg/dl), prothrombin fragment 1.2 (F1.2) (pM) and P-selectin (ng/ml).
Results:
Expressed as median (inter-quartile range). Significant arm/leg differences were observed in thrombin-antithrombin, antithrombin, prothrombin fragment 1.2 and P-selectin. The legs of patients had significantly reduced antithrombin activity and P-selectin concentrations compared to their arms (leg: 101 (90-108) versus arm: 112 (99-126), P = 0.001 and leg: 42 (26-52) versus 45 (27-52), P = 0.044, respectively). Control leg samples had significantly increased thrombin-antithrombin and P-selectin compared to control arm samples (leg: 2.1 (0.9-3.2) versus arm: 0.8 (0.5-1.7), P = 0.015 and leg: 36 (24-50) versus arm: 30 (23-41), P = 0.007, respectively). However, the control legs had significantly reduced F1.2 (leg: 265 (230-333) versus arm: 299 (236-361), P = 0.028). No significant arm/leg differences were detected in the microparticle or fibrinogen levels.
Conclusions:
These findings indicate that venous arm blood is significantly different from venous leg blood in four out of six biomarkers studied. Recognition of local venous leg sampling as a site for investigation may unravel why the leg has a greater predisposition to thrombosis and lead the way towards an arm/leg differential test.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
01:29Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
01:20Venous Thrombosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
01:30Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins
01:19Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System II: CRP, Hcy, and Cardiac Natriuretic Peptide Markers
These markers indicate stress or strain on the heart muscle:
Natriuretic Peptides (BNP)
Cardiac myocytes produce these hormones in response to ventricular stretching...
01:20Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System I: Cardiac Biomarkers
The essential diagnostic tools for detecting myocardial necrosis and monitoring individuals suspected of having acute coronary syndrome (ACS) include:
Troponins
Troponins, particularly cardiac troponins I and T, are the most precise and sensitive markers of myocardial injury. They are detectable within 4-6 hours of myocardial injury and remain...
01:27Assessment of the Cardiovascular System III: Palpation
Jugular Venous Pressure (JVP) Measurement
Position the patient at a thirty- to forty-five-degree angle or in a semi-fowler's position. Look for the highest point of pulsation in the internal jugular vein and measure the vertical distance to the angle of Loius or sternal angle. A normal JVP is 3-4 cm above...