Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

9.3K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
9.3K
Random Variables01:09

Random Variables

19.2K
A random variable is a single numerical value that indicates the outcome of a procedure. The concept of random variables is fundamental to the probability theory and was introduced by a Russian mathematician, Pafnuty Chebyshev, in the mid-nineteenth century.
Uppercase letters such as X or Y denote a random variable. Lowercase letters like x or y denote the value of a random variable. If X is a random variable, then X is written in words, and x is given as a number.
For example, let X = the...
19.2K
Random Sampling Method01:09

Random Sampling Method

15.9K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest. Among the various sampling methods used by...
15.9K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

565
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
565
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs01:20

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

385
Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to subjects...
385
Group Design02:01

Group Design

11.0K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
11.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Literature search for healthcare management decision-making on how to increase productivity by performing more surgical cases in the same staffed time.

Revista espanola de anestesiologia y reanimacion..·2024
Same author

The relative efficacy of multiple syringe tip disinfection techniques against virulent staphylococcus contamination.

The Journal of hospital infection·2024
Same author

Clarity needed from PUMA on interpreting end-tidal carbon dioxide in cardiac resuscitation.

Anaesthesia·2023
Same author

Handling injectable medications in anaesthesia: Guidelines from the Association of Anaesthetists.

Anaesthesia·2023
Same author

Characterizing the molecular epidemiology of anaesthesia work area transmission of Staphylococcus aureus sequence type 5.

The Journal of hospital infection·2023
Same author

More anaesthetists; fewer operations? Difficult questions for the specialty and stark planning implications of the 7th National Audit Project's anaesthetic activity survey.

Anaesthesia·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 11, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.5K

Calculating the probability of random sampling for continuous variables in submitted or published randomised

J B Carlisle1, F Dexter2, J J Pandit3

  • 1Department of Anaesthesia, Torbay Hospital, Torquay, Devon, UK.

Anaesthesia
|June 3, 2015
PubMed
Summary

A corrected chi-squared method and Monte Carlo simulations were used to analyze randomized controlled trial data. Monte Carlo simulations confirmed that Fujii et al.

More Related Videos

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
04:53

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition

Published on: September 20, 2019

11.5K
Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 11, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.5K
A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
04:53

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition

Published on: September 20, 2019

11.5K
Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1.4K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trial Methodology
  • Data Integrity

Background:

  • Previous analysis of randomized controlled trial (RCT) baseline data using a chi-squared method suggested improbable distributions.
  • Subsequent simulations indicated the original chi-squared method was flawed.
  • This study addresses the need for accurate statistical methods to assess data reliability in RCTs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To correct and evaluate a chi-squared method for analyzing RCT baseline data.
  • To compare the performance of the corrected chi-squared method, ANOVA, and Monte Carlo simulations in assessing random sampling probabilities.
  • To re-evaluate the baseline data from Fujii et al. RCTs using improved statistical approaches.

Main Methods:

  • Correction of a previously used chi-squared statistical method.
  • Application of Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) to assess random sampling.
  • Utilization of Monte Carlo simulations for probability analysis.
  • Comparison of statistical method performance with precisely and imprecisely reported means.

Main Results:

  • The corrected chi-squared and ANOVA methods showed inaccuracies with imprecisely reported means.
  • Monte Carlo simulations confirmed significant differences between Fujii et al.'s RCT baseline data and those from other authors (p < 10^-16).
  • Monte Carlo analysis identified fewer RCTs with unlikely distributions compared to the original chi-squared method, yet still confirmed highly improbable data in Fujii et al.'s trials.

Conclusions:

  • The distribution of baseline data in Fujii et al.'s RCTs is extremely unlikely to have arisen from random sampling.
  • Monte Carlo simulations appear to be a suitable screening tool for detecting non-random, potentially unreliable data in RCTs submitted for publication.
  • Accurate statistical methods are crucial for ensuring the integrity of data in clinical research.