Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 11, 2026

Whole Genome Sequencing of Candida glabrata for Detection of Markers of Antifungal Drug Resistance
Published on: December 28, 2017
Antifungal stewardship in daily practice and health economic implications
Patricia Muñoz1,2,3, Maricela Valerio1,3, Antonio Vena1,2,3
1Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Abstract:
During recent years, inappropriate antifungal use has contributed to the global increase in antifungal resistance and has played a role in the shift in the aetiology of invasive fungal infections. Moreover, overuse of antifungals may also lead to higher toxicity associated with unnecessary medication exposure and to increased healthcare costs. Antifungal stewardship (AFS) programmes consist of multidisciplinary interventions, led by specialists in infectious disease, microbiology and pharmacy that cooperate and communicate with the major prescribing departments in order to optimise antifungal therapies evaluating the indication, dose, streamlining and duration. Herein, we review the available evidence for the use of AFS and their impact on health economics. We also describe our AFS program, the successive steps we followed and the main difficulties we found.
Insights
Antifungal stewardship (AFS) programs optimize antifungal use, reducing resistance and costs. This review examines AFS evidence and presents a case study of implementing an AFS program.
Area of Science:
- Infectious Diseases
- Antimicrobial Resistance
- Health Economics
Background:
- Inappropriate antifungal use drives antifungal resistance and increases healthcare costs.
- Overuse of antifungals leads to toxicity and economic burden.
- Antifungal resistance poses a significant global health threat.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review evidence on Antifungal Stewardship (AFS) programs.
- To evaluate the health economic impact of AFS.
- To describe the implementation and challenges of a specific AFS program.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review of existing literature on AFS programs.
- Analysis of health economic data related to antifungal use.
- Retrospective description of a newly implemented AFS program, including steps and difficulties.
Main Results:
- AFS programs demonstrate positive impacts on antifungal prescribing patterns.
- Evidence suggests AFS can lead to significant cost savings.
- Implementation of AFS requires multidisciplinary collaboration and faces specific challenges.
Conclusions:
- AFS programs are crucial for combating antifungal resistance and improving patient outcomes.
- Implementing AFS requires careful planning, collaboration, and adaptation to local contexts.
- Further research is needed to fully elucidate the long-term economic benefits of AFS.
Related Concept Videos
Antifungal Agents
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions
Antimicrobial Effectiveness
Fungal Phylum Microsporidia
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Affecting Factors

