Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 11, 2026

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Diagnostic Strategies and Biomarker Development for Comprehensive Lung Function Analysis
Published on: August 9, 2024
Description and clinical application of the Pulfrich effect
Douglas J Lanska1, James M Lanska2, Bernd F Remler2
1From Neurology (D.J.L.) and Voluntary (J.M.L.) Services, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Great Lakes VA Healthcare System, Tomah, WI; Departments of Neurology and Ophthalmology (B.F.R.), Medical College of Wisconsin; and Neurology Service (B.F.R.), Zablocki Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Great Lakes VA Healthcare System, Milwaukee, WI. douglas.lanska@gmail.com.
Background:
In 1922, German physicist Carl Pulfrich described an illusory binocular perceptual disturbance in which an object moving across an observer's field of vision is perceived as traveling along a curved trajectory.
Objective:
To review the discovery of the Pulfrich effect, and subsequent clinical applications.
Methods:
We translated Pulfrich's description and searched for subsequent publications using electronic databases and review of reference lists in identified publications.
Results:
In 1901, Pulfrich developed an optical device to accurately compare stereoscopic photographs, but brightness difference between plates caused distance misperceptions that interfered with precise measurements. Pulfrich proposed that this Stereo-Effekt resulted from interocular differences in perceptual latency. He induced the effect by placing a smoked glass in front of one eye. The resulting perceptual disparity creates an apparently curved trajectory of an object moving sideways across the field of vision. Pulfrich also recognized that visual pathway disorders can produce a pathologic Stereo-Effekt. In 1925, Grimsdale demonstrated this in a man with unilateral retrobulbar optic neuritis and suggested treatment with a neutral density filter (NDF) over the good eye. Not until the 1970s, however, was the Pulfrich effect evaluated as a diagnostic test for retrobulbar optic neuritis and the therapeutic efficacy of an NDF confirmed.
Conclusion:
Although the clinical importance of the Pulfrich effect was suggested by Pulfrich and quickly confirmed, it took decades before its diagnostic utility and the efficacy of an NDF were assessed. Recognition remains clinically important to minimize safety risks and mislabeling, and because resulting misperceptions can be easily treated.
Related Concept Videos
Physical Assessment of the Respiratory Tract II: Palpation
Thoracic Palpation
Thoracic palpation detects tenderness, masses, lesions, respiratory excursions, and vocal fremitus. The nurse assesses...
Pulmonary Function Tests
Pulmonary Function Tests are crucial diagnostic tools for assessing respiratory function, particularly in patients with chronic respiratory disorders. They comprehensively evaluate lung volumes, ventilatory function, breathing mechanics, diffusion, and gas exchange. These tests help diagnose pulmonary diseases and play a significant role in monitoring disease progression, evaluating disability, and assessing response to therapy.
PFTs involve using a spirometer, a...
Respiratory System Abnormal Finding II: Palpation and Auscultation
Palpation Findings
During a respiratory assessment, palpation can reveal several vital abnormalities:

